User talk:Deltahedron

convergents series for Riemann Hypothesis

Helo Deltahedron.

Excuse me, I guess the most important is the contribution I present ( cinvergents series); as of today no one made a convergents series in Riemann Hypothesis. So has relevance for Wikipedia query because it serves students.

Another thing, do you be a good mathematician; refute the article.

It is regrettable his decision as librarian.

Regards. Jhon Hard (talk)12:22 18 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Homomorphism may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Saunders Mac Lane | title=Categories for the Working Mathematician | publisher=Springer-Verlag]] | isbn=0-387-90036-5 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | page=363 | title=Hopf Algebra: An Introduction |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gilbreath's conjecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unsolved Problems in Number Theory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Kathleen Ollerenshaw

I hope this is leaving a message for you, I find the whole "edit wiki" thing very complicated. With regards to Dame Kathleen Ollerenshaw I did not know what to put under "cite or reference" as the information on her death has come to me via a friend who still works at St John Ambulance (where I used to work) to say she died last night. I am hoping to get links or information to her funeral but I am not sure if that will be posted on a website for me to "cite" the website? I do not yet have info if she died after midnight ie 11/08/14 or before it ie 10/08/14 but was going to update my edit on Wiki if I eventually found that information out. I knew Dame Kathleen via my working at St John Ambulance (their original county HQ building was financed largely by funding raised by Dame Kathleen and she set up their first computer system so is there any way to put the date of her death on the page if her funeral details are not posted on a website anywhere?

RespectForDameKathleen (talk) 20:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC) if those squiggles do not sign my user name it is RespectForDameKathleen

Thank you for your response. As you know, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and we report only what can be verified by independent reliable sources. A personal communication that cannot be verified cannot be used. If and when someone's death is announced and reported, for example in the press, then we can cite the press report. We need to be very careful when writing about living people to make sure that our articles are accurate. Deltahedron (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

OK I will wait to see if there is anything reported which can be linked to. Thank you.

RespectForDameKathleen (talk) 21:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I should say, incidentally, that I had met Dame Kathleen on various occasions and was sorry to hear the report, whether or not we can yet report it on Wikipedia. Deltahedron (talk) 21:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, I notice it has been updated now with the newspaper report. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/dame-kathleen-ollerenshaw-former-lord-7597607

She was one absolutely amazing lady, I went to her house once and she had virtually a full sized telescope sticking out through the roof! RespectForDameKathleen (talk) 11:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop writing new article about stuff you don't understand much

Rational series being a prime example. Dumping a bunch of defs from a book is easy. It's clear that you don't understand much about the topic given all the links you didn't place in the article. JMP EAX (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Also read WP:V. You have added these references to the crappy stub on rational language, seemingly verifying the content. Show me where they actually define the notion as written in that wiki page. JMP EAX (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't be rude: I won't respond to this sort of stuff. If you have suggestions for improving the article, make them in the article talk page, or be bold and edit it yourself. Deltahedron (talk) 06:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)