User talk:202.189.98.131: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 03:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 03:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
||
*I warned you not to refactor the talk page posts of other editors. You restored [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=481254417 this post] after the OP had deleted the message. Editors are allowed to reconsider their posts and remove them if the removal does not change the meaning of, or directly impact, the discussion thread. You have proven to me that you either do not understand the collaborative environment we are attempting to foster or are deliberately striving to undermine our efforts. The resulting disruption is the same. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 03:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC) |
*I warned you not to refactor the talk page posts of other editors. You restored [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_China&diff=prev&oldid=481254417 this post] after the OP had deleted the message. Editors are allowed to reconsider their posts and remove them if the removal does not change the meaning of, or directly impact, the discussion thread. You have proven to me that you either do not understand the collaborative environment we are attempting to foster or are deliberately striving to undermine our efforts. The resulting disruption is the same. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 03:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
:202.189.98.131 |
|||
:It's amazing how they can [[spin doctor]] you to look like such a bad person when all you did was restore a comment that the author deleted. |
|||
:Don't worry, this kind of thing happens all the time on Wikipedia, it's nothing about you. And it's not just Wikipedia's fault, other websites are like this too. For example, in Conservapedia, another version of Wikipedia, it's rumoured that something got so darn bad a person committed suicide. |
|||
:Tide rolls could have calmly discussed the comment your restored and had a nice chat with you on the go. But no. S/he felt "ah! You're the guy who touches people's comments. We've disagreed over this before, but we won't disagree again cause you're blocked hehe. I told you." |
|||
:Have a nice day. [[Special:Contributions/135.0.167.6|135.0.167.6]] ([[User talk:135.0.167.6|talk]]) 01:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:30, 3 October 2014
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
 Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Welcome!
Hello, 202.189.98.131, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
March 2012
- From this discussion:
Regardless of whether you are the said sockmaster (Instantnood), the fact that you are behind a floating IP range makes it very difficult and confusing for other Wikipedia editors to engage in discussions with you. Therefore, please sign up for an account, otherwise administrators will have no recourse but to block you for technical reasons. Deryck C. 17:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- No I am not Instantnood. I have no idea about this person. Technical reason? I have lived in different countries. In all these countries people are innocent until proven guilty. That's my understanding of being civilised. 202.189.98.131 (talk) 18:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, innocence is always assumed until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Without a coherent contribution history for others to look into, there is little reasonable doubt with which you can defend yourself once you've been accused of being a sockpuppet, a process certain editors are inclined to use rather indiscriminately. Deryck C. 22:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- If they cannot connect contribution history, it means reasonable evidence is lacking. 202.189.98.131 (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Those in charge often appear to believe otherwise. I've given my best advice to help you get on, if you don't heed it then it's your problem. Deryck C. 00:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- If they cannot connect contribution history, it means reasonable evidence is lacking. 202.189.98.131 (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you indeed. Just that I'm not quite convinced. Give me some time to think about it again. 202.189.98.131 (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Your edits at Talk:Republic of China
Please stop refactoring the talk page comments of other editors at Talk:Republic of China. Thanks Tiderolls 23:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- "Please stop refactoring.." That's what I never did. I only move mislocated ones to correct locations to facilitate discussion. I don't refactor any actual content. But anyhow thanks for your kind reminder. 202.189.98.131 (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- No need to quote me, I know what I posted. I wasn't seeking an explanation, I was attempting to keep you from being blocked for disruption. If you continue you will be blocked. Tiderolls 23:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- I wanted to emphasise that I was responding specifically to "refactoring". I don't think I had done anything wrong to fix mislocated comments. Such comments jeopardise effective communication. And I followed the guidelines and the general practice to do so. 202.189.98.131 (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Your block
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 03:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)- I warned you not to refactor the talk page posts of other editors. You restored this post after the OP had deleted the message. Editors are allowed to reconsider their posts and remove them if the removal does not change the meaning of, or directly impact, the discussion thread. You have proven to me that you either do not understand the collaborative environment we are attempting to foster or are deliberately striving to undermine our efforts. The resulting disruption is the same. Tiderolls 03:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- 202.189.98.131
- It's amazing how they can spin doctor you to look like such a bad person when all you did was restore a comment that the author deleted.
- Don't worry, this kind of thing happens all the time on Wikipedia, it's nothing about you. And it's not just Wikipedia's fault, other websites are like this too. For example, in Conservapedia, another version of Wikipedia, it's rumoured that something got so darn bad a person committed suicide.
- Tide rolls could have calmly discussed the comment your restored and had a nice chat with you on the go. But no. S/he felt "ah! You're the guy who touches people's comments. We've disagreed over this before, but we won't disagree again cause you're blocked hehe. I told you."
- Have a nice day. 135.0.167.6 (talk) 01:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)