User talk:Die-yng

Notice

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy. The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. TaraInDC (talk) 05:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm Gamaliel. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Gamergate controversy that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

The issue here is that you are responding to threads that in the speed of how things are going on the talk page have already ended (two days is already considered pretty much over) so there is absolutely no purpose for you to add onto them your various points which violate WP:NOTFORUM amongst other guidelines and policies.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 72 hours for violating the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy by posting and restoring an unsourced personal attack on the subject of the article. Dreadstar ☥ 21:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Die-yng (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would understand the block, if a)my post was intended as an attack on Brianna Wu, which it wasn't. Simply stating that someone just claims something without proof is no attack on this person. And b) I also provided a link to the source for my opinion, a interview with Brianna Wu that was posted by the official channel of the talk show "David Pakman Show " on the 27th of October 2014. Mrs. Wu makes all these claims in the interview and has no satisfying answer when asked how she comes to this conclusion or if there's any evidence. I realize that this is a hot topic, and if you would be willing to tell me how my post would not be considered an attack on a person, I would be very willing to follow.

I've read the guideline, but I can see no violation of it in my post. Especially since I did not simply restore my previous post, but changed it to be less critical of Mrs. Wu. And again, my claim is not unsourced. Certainly an interview where the person herself says exactly what I attribute to her is a reliable source in this case.

In addition, I would also c) understand this action (the block), if I had actually posted any of this in the biography, which I did not. I only posted it on the talk page. I know the guideline is for any Wikipedia page, but I still think there is a difference between the actual biography and the talk-page thereof.

And let me add that in the last few days, 7 of my edits have been deleted, something that has never happened to me before, neither on the German Wikipedia, nor here. Six of those edits were done by Ryulong and I couldn't be sure if any of those were done for anything but spite, because I had dared to question his neutrality on the topic of #gamergate. He removed one of my posts with the reasoning that I was posting inside an old topic, when there were posts in the very same paragraph, done at the same day my post was made and one by Ryulong himself on November the 5th, a day after I made my original post. Given that, I suspected a biased removal of my edits and checked each one, changed them when necessary and then re-installed those I felt were removed without an actual reason.

With all of the above as a reason, I ask for leniency and removal of my block.Die-yng (talk) 21:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on your unblock request, it seems you don't entirely understand why you have been blocked. For the avoidance of doubt, you have blocked for making attacks on a living person. In your unblock request, you make further attacks, this time against Ryulong, who you accuse of being motivated by 'spite'. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. Before making a new unblock request, I suggest you read WP:NOTTHEM. PhilKnight (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Topic ban

The following sanction has been imposed on you:

Topic ban from all articles related to GamerGate and Brianna Wu, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for personal attacks on other editors, inappropriate comments requiring revision deletion, and having inappropriate username for editing articles about people who have received death threats.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Gamergate, and the procedure described at Wikipedia:General sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Gamaliel (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)