User talk:Worldedixor

@Bishonen - I just realized that I cannot write to you on your talk page. So, I am writing to you here.

QUESTIONS TO THE BLOCKING ADMIN only, per policy, so that I can clearly understand what I was blocked for indefinitely:

A. I had a few days to calm down and reflect on this block. I feel that this indefinite block was a heavy-handed punishment considering that other editors engaging in open edit wars and multiple policy violations have received much lesser block periods or none.

QUESTION 1: Per policy, does indefinite block mean a permanent block?

Ergo, I would like to understand the violations, if any. I will ask in good faith that you reply responsively and in a helpful matter so that I can understand the violations you alleged that I committed on the day of November 5, 2014 and what I was blocked for.

B. I understand that your reason for taking your admin decision of blocking me indefinitely was "Persistent personal attacks and harassment after warnings". I also understand that the policy provisions on which you based your block will be expressly delineated in WP:NPA and WP:HA.

• You also stated (verifiable at [1]):

"Worldedixor, do you realize that you have edited PBS's page 45 times in a space of six hours? (Posting your so often stated "I am out of here" as early as the second of the 45 edits — perhaps your password was hacked and somebody else did the other 43?) And yet you state in (approximately) the tenth that "I have shown a lot of restraint today". If nothing else, I presume you realize each of those edits gives the user an alert?"... and then ended with "I have blocked you indefinitely for persistent personal attacks and harassment."

• I understand that PBS stated that he did not get 45 alerts. He only got one alert. Still, I was unware of the alerts nor that there was a limit on the number of edits an editor can make in a six hours period especially that most of my edits were consecutive (which is allowed by policy even in a 1RR), when I have not changed any of my edits after aonther editor has responded.

QUESTION 2: In any case, if this was not stated in error, can you show me what policy provision restricts edits in a six hour period? I will certainly take note of it, apologize for violating that provision of policy, and will no longer violate it.

C. For easy refernce, I will copy what I wrote on November 5, 2014 on PBS talk page which can be verified at [2]

This is always the case. They come as a "tag team" and a lynch mob with their "local" consensus of a (very) small number of email pals to attack me just to keep me away from Wikipedia. They do not attack as individuals, but rather they coordinate their attacks. The latest being P123ct1 falsely claiming that an IP accusing his/her of WP:OWN of being me (without naming me) and running his/her mouth to rally his/her troops [[3]]. I will employ restraint and not point out his/her (many) tactics of "doing something and then accusing me of doing it" but I will give this example [4]. Talking about a dossier [[5]]. I will simply ask him/her to read WP:HA#NOT, especially "Neither is tracking a user's contributions for policy violations". At the ANI against Gregkaye, I did not even track him/her, it was right there under everyone's nose, and I did point out what s/he did which was inconsistent with policy. It is his/her falsely accusing me of personally attacking him/her that is a policy violation. As far as my "article" edits, they speak for themselves. I got encouragement from PBS' words today, but now P123ct1 took it all away. Also, s/he just confronted me on my one "minor" edit to the IS article [6]. Instead of an edit war, I just let it be. S/he also attacked me by calling me names at [7]. Also, I am not even sure how consistent is his/her unfathomable conduct here [8] is with policy. My problem is I don't have a lot of free time on my hand. I am out of here. Worldedixor (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop accusing me of what you do to me, and read this: "However, there is an endemic problem on Wikipedia of giving "harassment" a much broader and inaccurate meaning which encompasses." Also, please stop dragging me back into your Rehash and Battleground arena, every time I go away to avoid it. Worldedixor (talk) 02:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Stop your Battleground antics and allow this unbiased admin to objectively assess your conduct today. I have left all the "glory" of editing that article to you and your email pal long ago. Also, changing your edit after I had responded as you have done more than once, and like you did now [9] is inconsistent with policy. This is a verifiable fact. Don't label it an attack. Finally, you and your email pal should read WP:ADMINSHOP as it is inconsistent with policy, and you should not bite a WP:NEWCOMER just because they made an observation of your conduct. Have a good night and enjoy life. Worldedixor (talk) 02:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Technophant is not an unbiased "peacemaker" in this. He is P123ct1's email pal. As I stated above, this is always the case. They come as a "tag team" and a lynch mob to drag me to their WP:BATTLEGROUND rather than communicate as individual editors. This is why I have decided to walk away from any and all edit conflict to avoid a potential WP:EW with them not even revert their edits even though they always confront my "minimal" number of well sourced edits. It is just not worth it. I don't have the time to list all incidents of his conduct that is inconsistent with policy, but I don't need to. This unbiased admin, PBS, has seen through the cloud screens, and has stated facts about the "unjustified" RFC for which, in my opinion, Technophant has canvassed in bad faith and in sheer violation of policy WP:CANVASS. Also, his larger than life diagram here and accusations, to me, sound like a personal attack. I did not call him or P123ct1 names. Enough WP:REHASH and vindictiveness already. I have shown a lot of restraint today adhering to policy even after P123ct1's false accusation and personal attack as stated above and as can be seen here [10] (without naming me). They should not be allowed to push me. Worldedixor (talk) 03:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You are not telling the truth. If I am going to be sanctioned for telling the verifiable truth, so be it. Also, you don't need to scream at me with bold letters. I stopped using bold letters when I realized how it affected other editors. You are still doing it. The RFC/U was unwarranted and was done in complete bad faith. It was biased and there was nothing kind about it. It was a lynch mob and a bad faith pretext to call me all sort of names by a (very) small number of editors on the RFC Talk page and no one was ever sanctioned. You wanted your own "local" club and your (very) small consensus playground in the article. You did all you could to push me away. Well, you succeeded, and I have completely stayed away from the article even though I have exceptional knowledge in it, because of you and him/her. You both seem to have a pattern of systematically violating policy and then say sorry and "I regret", the most recent being this edit [11] that you made today for some self-serving agenda, when the closing admin expressly stated "No further edits should be made to this page". This is unjust, selective, as it is inconsistent with policy and other closed RFCs that are not edited at will by non-admins, and it has gotten way too old. I don't have time for this but I am sure that time, and other editors, will expose all. Have a good night and try to enjoy life and let others enjoy theirs. Worldedixor (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, PC123ct1, I remember, and I remember how a biased someone, who I will not include now because he has backed off, wound you up, enabled you, and put you against me. In any case, I am out of here. Have a good night the both of you. Enjoy life!... Worldedixor (talk) 04:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

QUESTION 3: Can you point out which one of my sentences specifically amount to WP:NPA and/or WP:HA? Once I understand it and verify the specific policy provision(s) in WP:NPA and WP:HA, I will comply with it in the future.

QUESTION 4: I am an editor with exceptional knowledge and my history of "article" edits are well sourced and consistent with policy. Are you aware of my good contributions to Wikipedia? and do you have anything encouraging to say about my always sourced "article" contributions?. If you need examples, ask.

QUESTION 5: Are you aware that many of my highly insightful and well sourced edits have been repeatedly confronted and reverted? Are you aware that I did not even do a 1RR to avoid a WP:EW? If you need examples, ask.

QUESTION 6: Are you aware that 2 months after another editor reverted my insightful contribution and added a difficult-to-find, non-English reliable source that I duly translated accurately into English in the ISIL article that truly needs my insight and language capabilities, it was found out (by someone who can speak the language less fluently than me) that I what I edited was 100% correct and well sourced? If you need an extensive, complete and verifiable evidence, ask.

QUESTION 7: On November 5, 2014, were you aware that I was instigated first and dragged back into this arena? Do you believe that I was the only editor whose edits on November 5 (or afterwards) were inconsistent with policy?

QUESTION 8: I understand that policy expressly allows going through another editor's contributions and pointing out their pattern of policy violations (it expressly says that this is not a policy violation). I understand that policy does not distinguish between "big or small" violations reported. Is my understanding of policy wrong? If yes, help me understand so I can verify and avoid violating this policy in the future.

QUESTION 9: Are you aware that an editor attacked me calling me a name toxic after my having been indefinitely blocked for 4 days WP:NPA and I had zero interactions with him? Are you also aware that there were other gloating/snide remarks/digs made about me in the last few days? Is this consistent with policy or even tolerated?

Worldedixor (talk) 04:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: A well-meaning editor made unsolicited minor corrections to the content of my talk page above. I stand corrected and I thank him for doing it. Worldedixor (talk) 08:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)