Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Раціональне анархіст

Раціональне анархіст

Раціональне анархіст (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Раціональне анархіст/Archive.

03 January 2015

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

• BBnumber1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Both users seem to have an intense dislike for pornography in general and the people who defend such material.

Раціональне анархіст has nominated several porn biographies for deletion.

Раціональне анархіст has also gone to the notability guideline for people to try to have PORNBIO changed as it is 'too permissive'.

Bbnumber1 has first and only substantial edit was to report an established editor as an 'SPA', claim without evidence that they are an insider to the porn industry because they !vote keep in afds in the topic.

Particularly, one diff in general that I think ties them together is this one. Using the -exact same terms- to refer to Rebecca. They are a porn 'insider' and are not 'here' to build the encylopedia. Tutelary (talk) 09:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

The "evidence" here is surpassingly ridiculous. Several editors have used the very common word "insider" to refer to Rebecca 1990, quite plausibly. Bbnumber1 repeats/references those commnts and uses the same common term. While Bbnumber1 is almost certainly an improper alternate account, there is no serious evidence linking them to the alleged sockmaster. At this point, all we have is a proposal for a fishing expedition. There may or may not be a fish in the pond, but there's not enough here to justify a CU. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Раціональне анархіст is most likely Redban, a recently blocked user. Their behavior is identical:

• 1. Redban started 15 AfD's all at once and now Раціональне анархіст has started 10 AfD's all at once (WP:P*/D).
• 2. Most AfD's started by both Redban and Раціональне анархіст pass WP:PORNBIO (WP:P*/D).
• 3. Both Redban and Раціональне анархіст have asked to have the AVN Hall of Fame inductions removed from PORNBIO even though there is absolutely no controversy whatsoever over this criteria.
• 4. Both of them have complained about the amount of people inducted into the AVN Hall of Fame. Rebecca1990 (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• BBnumber1 is quite clearly User:Redban. CU confirms this, and I can find no sleepers.  Check declined by a checkuser to run any checks related to Раціональне анархіст in the absence of actual evidence. Courcelles 18:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
• I'm closing this case with no action taken. I don't think the evidence is sufficient for a behavioral-based block. Mike V • Talk 18:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

---