Talk:Donor-advised fund: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Hyphenation: new section |
→Hyphenation: r |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [http://www.fidelitycharitable.org/beta/giving-account/page.shtml?immid=PCD Fidelity Charitable] |
* [http://www.fidelitycharitable.org/beta/giving-account/page.shtml?immid=PCD Fidelity Charitable] |
||
I prefer to have WP use the hyphen and make some sources look illiterate than the other way around. The hyphen makes things easier for the readers, too. [[User:Chris the speller|<font color="#C30">'''Chris'''</font> <font color="#060">'''the speller'''</font>]] [[User talk:Chris the speller|<font color="#900"><sup>yack</sup></font>]] 18:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC) |
I prefer to have WP use the hyphen and make some sources look illiterate than the other way around. The hyphen makes things easier for the readers, too. [[User:Chris the speller|<font color="#C30">'''Chris'''</font> <font color="#060">'''the speller'''</font>]] [[User talk:Chris the speller|<font color="#900"><sup>yack</sup></font>]] 18:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Thank you for your astonishingly prodigious contributions. The lack of hyphen makes my teeth hurt too. My impression is that the folks who invented the subject of this article do not hyphenate, and that most RS I have seen does not hyphenate. This question is frustrated by the pathetic state of the refs in this article. How would you characterize the bulk of RS? [[User:HughD|Hugh]] ([[User talk:HughD|talk]]) 18:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:22, 7 March 2015
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Donor-advised fund article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Hyphenation
I feel that the article title should be "Donor-advised fund". It's not difficult to find sources that omit the hyphen, but its also not difficult to find sources that use the hyphen, realizing that "Donor-advised" is a compound modifier that screams out for hyphenation. These sites are not run by fools:
I prefer to have WP use the hyphen and make some sources look illiterate than the other way around. The hyphen makes things easier for the readers, too. Chris the speller yack 18:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your astonishingly prodigious contributions. The lack of hyphen makes my teeth hurt too. My impression is that the folks who invented the subject of this article do not hyphenate, and that most RS I have seen does not hyphenate. This question is frustrated by the pathetic state of the refs in this article. How would you characterize the bulk of RS? Hugh (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)