Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangeeta N Kale: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:15, 9 March 2015

Sangeeta N Kale

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ACADEMICS: very few reliable sources cover this person and it's very unlikely that the subject meets any WP:NACADEMICS criteria, given the lack of coverage by independent reliable sources and I can not find any evidence that this subject meets any of the WP:NACADEMICS criteria. Esquivalience ^t 23:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An h-index of 3 is not nearly enough for WP:PROF, and I'm not seeing other WP:PROF criteria satisfied either. -- 120.17.65.148 (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :{{la|Sangeeta N Kale}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangeeta N Kale|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 March 8#{{anchorencode:Sangeeta N Kale}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sangeeta_N_Kale Stats]</span>)
 :({{Find sources AFD|Sangeeta N Kale}})
-Fails [[WP:BASIC]] and [[WP:ACADEMICS]]: '''very''' few [[WP:RS|reliable]] sources cover this person and it's very unlikely that the subject meets any [[WP:NACADEMICS]] criteria, given the lack of coverage by reliable sources and I can not find any evidence that this subject meets any of the [[WP:NACADEMICS]] criteria. '''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 23:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
+Fails [[WP:BASIC]] and [[WP:ACADEMICS]]: '''very''' few [[WP:RS|reliable]] sources cover this person and it's very unlikely that the subject meets any [[WP:NACADEMICS]] criteria, given the lack of coverage by ''independent'' reliable sources and I can not find any evidence that this subject meets any of the [[WP:NACADEMICS]] criteria. '''[[User:Esquivalience|<span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Esquivalience|<span style="color:#00B88A;">t</span>]]</sup>''' 23:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India|list of India-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)</small>