Perinçek v. Switzerland: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 685842365 by EtienneDolet (talk)The issue is not "legibility" and you strike us as not the best authority on what constitutes good English. |
Undid revision 685842299 by EtienneDolet (talk)Rubbish. Stop wikilawyering to advance your semi-literate juvenile POV. |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
[[Doğu Perinçek]] is a Turkish political activist who has repeatedly |
[[Doğu Perinçek]] is a Turkish political activist who has repeatedly called the Armenian genocide of 1915–1917 a lie on his visits to Switzerland. He was found guilty of [[racial discrimination]] by a Swiss district court in [[Lausanne]] in March 2007. He was sentenced to 90 days imprisonment and fined 3000 Swiss francs.<ref name="humanrights">{{cite web|url=http://www.humanrights.ch/en/Switzerland/Internal-Affairs/Racism/Trials/idart_5082-content.html|title=Conviction for denial of Armenia genocide - humanrights.ch|publisher=humanrights.ch|date=2011-01-12<!-- 16:14:21-->|accessdate=2014-04-04}}</ref> At the trial, Perinçek denied the charge thus: "I have not denied genocide because there was no genocide."<ref>{{cite news|title=Turk guilty over genocide remarks|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6434041.stm|work=[[BBC News]]|date=9 March 2007}}</ref> After the court's decision, he said, "I defend my right to freedom of expression." Perinçek appealed the verdict. In December 2007, the [[Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland|Swiss Federal Court]] confirmed the sentence given to Perinçek.<ref>[http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/front/Court_confirms_verdict_against_Perin_ek.html?siteSect=104&sid=8549273&cKey=1198071731000&ty=nd Court confirms verdict against Perinçek], SwissInfo, December 19, 2007</ref> Perinçek then appealed to the ECHR. |
||
==Judgment== |
==Judgment== |
||
Revision as of 11:24, 15 October 2015
| Perinçek v. Switzerland | |
|---|---|
| Court | European Court of Human Rights |
| Decided | 17 December 2013 |
Perinçek v. Switzerland is a 2013 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) concerning the freedom of expression of Dr Doğu Perinçek, lawyer, academic and one time Chairman of the Turkish Workers’ Party, who was convicted by a Swiss court for publicly challenging the existence of the Armenian genocide.[1][2][a]
An appeal by Switzerland is currently before the Grand Chamber. A preliminary hearing was held on 28 January 2015. The Grand Chamber ruled in favour of Perinçek on 15 October 2015.
Background
Doğu Perinçek is a Turkish political activist who has repeatedly called the Armenian genocide of 1915–1917 a lie on his visits to Switzerland. He was found guilty of racial discrimination by a Swiss district court in Lausanne in March 2007. He was sentenced to 90 days imprisonment and fined 3000 Swiss francs.[3] At the trial, Perinçek denied the charge thus: "I have not denied genocide because there was no genocide."[4] After the court's decision, he said, "I defend my right to freedom of expression." Perinçek appealed the verdict. In December 2007, the Swiss Federal Court confirmed the sentence given to Perinçek.[5] Perinçek then appealed to the ECHR.
Judgment
In December 2013 the European Court of Human Rights ruled by 5-2 that Switzerland had violated Doğu Perinçek's freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It ruled that Perinçek had not abused his rights within the meaning of Article 17 of the Convention, which prohibits individuals using the rights of the Convention to seek the abolition or restriction of other individuals' rights guaranteed by the Convention.
The Court pointed out that " ... it was not called upon to rule on the legal characterisation of the Armenian Genocide. The existence of a “genocide”, which was a precisely defined legal concept, was not easy to prove. The Court doubted that there could be a general consensus as to events such as those at issue, given that historical research was by definition open to discussion and a matter of debate, without necessarily giving rise to final conclusions or to the assertion of objective and absolute truths."[6] The Court was not persuaded the Swiss authorities had shown there was a pressing social need to punish an individual for racial discrimination simply for challenging as "genocide" the massacres perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire in the year 1915 and following.[2]
Appeal
After the ruling the government of Switzerland announced its decision to appeal the court’s ruling. On 3 June 2014 the ECHR accepted the appeal to move on to the Grand Chamber to clarify the scope available to Swiss authorities in applying the Swiss Criminal Code to combat racism.[7][8]
The first hearing took take place on 28 January 2015 with Perinçek represented by Prof Laurent Pech, head of Department of Law at Middlesex University in London, and Turkey represented as a third party by Prof Stefan Talmon, who is a professor of law at Oxford University.[9] Switzerland was represented by lawyer Frank Schürmann while Armenia was represented as a third party by Doughty Street Chambers led by Geoffrey Robertson QC and Amal Clooney. The Court's subsequent deliberations will be held in private, with its findings published later.[10][11] A video of the first hearing of the appeal can be found on the website of the European Court for Human Rights.
The Grand Chamber ruled in favour of Perinçek on 15 October 2015.[12]
Reaction
Positive
Professor Dirk Voorhoof of Ghent University wrote a positive critique of the judgment and argues that it "would certainly be a sad day for freedom of expression in Europe" if the judgment was successfully appealed to the Grand Chamber. Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance has accused Geoffrey Robertson and Amal Clooney of hypocrisy.[13][14]
Negative
The Armenian writer Harut Sassounian described the Court’s judgment an endorsement of the denialist stance of both Turkey and Perinçek.[15] Geoffrey Robertson QC called Perinçek a "vexatious litigant pest" at the ECHR hearing.[16]
See also
Notes
- ^ Perinçek's 2013 indictment in Turkey was unrelated to this case and was to do with the Ergenekon trials where Perinçek was found guilty of plotting against the Turkish government and was given a life sentence (from which he was released in March 2014).
References
- ^ THE PERINÇEK V. SWITZERLAND CASE AND THE HOLOCAUST DENIAL; by Maxime Gauin , published in Times of Israel on January 19, 2015
- ^ a b Voorhoof, Dirk. "Criminal conviction for denying the existence of the Armenian "genocide" violates freedom of expression". strasbourgobservers.com. Strasbourg Observers. Cite error: The named reference "Voorhoof" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ "Conviction for denial of Armenia genocide - humanrights.ch". humanrights.ch. 2011-01-12. Retrieved 2014-04-04.
- ^ "Turk guilty over genocide remarks". BBC News. 9 March 2007.
- ^ Court confirms verdict against Perinçek, SwissInfo, December 19, 2007
- ^ "Criminal conviction for denial that the atrocities perpetrated against the Armenian people in 1915 and years after constituted genocide was unjustified". ECHR (press release).
- ^ European Rights Court Agrees to Hear Swiss Appeal on Perinçek Ruling. Asbarez. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 3 June 2014
- ^ Völkermord-Urteil wird überprüft. (German) Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 3 June 2014
- ^ "ECHR adjourns ruling on Turkey’s Worker’s Party chair over 1915 statements", Hurriyet Daily News, published January 28, 2015 [1]
- ^ Squires, Nick (12 January 2015). "Amal Clooney takes on Armenia genocide case in European court". The Daily Telegraph.
- ^ Malm, Sara. "It's Amal versus the genocide-deniers: Mrs Clooney leads Euro-court fight for Turkish MP to be prosecuted for calling death of 1.5million Armenians 'a lie'". The Daily Mail.
- ^ "European Court confirms Perinçek's right to freedom of speech". Swissinfo.
- ^ "Geoffrey Robertson : A Man with two faces", Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance [2]
- ^ "Caption Contest", Australian Turkish Advocacy Alliance's website
- ^ "Switzerland Must Appeal European Court's Verdict on the Armenian Genocide | Asbarez Armenian News". asbarez.com. Retrieved 2014-04-04.
- ^ Third Party - Armenian Government's observations, Hearing of Perinçek v Switzerland Case January 28th, 2015, European Court of Human Rights [3]
External links
- ECHR Judgment (French)
- ECHR Judgment (English)