User talk:Smashem

Welcome!

Hello, Smashem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Smashem, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Props!

Props to this person on their work on the ITM Cup 2015. You support the Steamers? Haha. Nice work man. Sirpottingmix (talk) 06:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Allgood bro. Hope the Turbos win against Welly tomorrow and see what happens tonight. Turbos Fan here! See if we can stay alive and get Waikato relegated. Sirpottingmix (talk) 06:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Course they didn't... Turbos had a shocking season though. Such a shame. Sirpottingmix (talk) 08:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Joseph Parker

Thanks dude for editing the page I was gonna do it but I see ya beat me to it good work mate... you rock Wwemeowmeow (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Warning re PRO Rugby edit war

You have made the same change to the teams table at the PRO Rugby page three times now. It is clear that you have not gained consensus to make this change. I have already asked you through edit summaries and discussion at the PRO Rugby talk page to please stop the WP:EDITWAR. The best step you can take at this point is to revert your own edit, and use the PRO Rugby talk page to discuss this issue. CUA 27 (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Warning re PRO Rugby WP:PUPPET

I was initially relieved when I saw that you self-reverted your edit at PRO Rugby in response to my message above re you making the same revert three times. But then, using a different account, you went back to the PRO Rugby article and largely undid your self-revert. I see that the version of the table you restored was not exactly the same as prior versions you had tried to impose, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are trying to work towards an improved version. But several editors (and admins) might view your behavior as improper WP:SOCKPUPPET and an attempt to avoid the WP:3RR limit.

Please continue to use one account when you have editing disagreements and are reverting. And try to use the article talk page more —or at least edit summaries — to explain your views. CUA 27 (talk) 02:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)