User talk:Muhammadahmad79: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:03, 6 July 2016

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Stop POV pushing on Sherwani

You have recently deleted a lot of content on the Sherwani page, and replaced it with your POV. Wikipedia is not meant to promote one's own POV rather for presenting facts. Use talk page for Adding the content on the page next time, don't engage in edit wars. Barthateslisa (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Article was full of false and unsourced information which merged the two different dresses with different origins namely sherwani and achkan. All I deleted was the unsourced content and all I added were the common facts with some sources. - Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 11:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Astronomy in the medieval Islamic world. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The normal practice, when an edit is reverted, is to open a discussion on the talk page. You have been warned of ARBIPA sanctions. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics.  This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
 }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 15:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
+== July 2016 ==
+[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Astronomy in the medieval Islamic world]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
+Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states:
+# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
+# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
+If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''{{Break}}''The normal practice, when an edit is reverted, is to open a discussion on the talk page. You have been warned of ARBIPA sanctions.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 00:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)