Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Buckinghamshire/archive1: Difference between revisions
Dudley Miles (talk | contribs) Thanks |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
'''Support''' – only quibble is you could link county in the lead sentence. Otherwise it's pretty faultless, prose is sufficient, table is appropriately formatted and so are the references. [[User:Lemonade51|Lemonade51]] ([[User talk:Lemonade51|talk]]) 01:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC) |
'''Support''' – only quibble is you could link county in the lead sentence. Otherwise it's pretty faultless, prose is sufficient, table is appropriately formatted and so are the references. [[User:Lemonade51|Lemonade51]] ([[User talk:Lemonade51|talk]]) 01:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
*Link added. Thanks very much Lemonade. [[User:Dudley Miles|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles|talk]]) 18:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC) |
*Link added. Thanks very much Lemonade. [[User:Dudley Miles|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles|talk]]) 18:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
;Source review - passed |
|||
* Formatting: No problems. |
|||
* Spotchecks: Checked refs 6, 16, 27, 38; no problems |
|||
* Completeness: No obvious sources missing |
|||
Promoting! --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 16:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC) |
|||
{{FLCClosed|promoted}} |
Revision as of 16:07, 4 August 2016
List of Local Nature Reserves in Buckinghamshire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
This is the fourth list of Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) in English counties I have nominated for FLC. LNRs are designated by local authorities for their biological or geological interest. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC) |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – With the fixes, I find the list to be of similar quality to the other ones in the category that Dudley has worked on. Nice job yet again. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Support – Meets the FL criteria, and is of the same high quality as earlier FLs in the same series. Two v. minor points in passing: "anthill" is one word rather than two according to the OED and Collins and is one hyphenated word according to Chambers (Chairborough Road); and I don't suppose you meant to pluralise "deer" as "deers" (Warren Nature Reserve). – Tim riley talk 05:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Many thanks Tim. Both your points are interesting. I have changed "anthill" to one word, although it looks wrong to me. OED quotes Smeathman 1781 as giving two words, but I fear that is not Sufficient Authority. I have also changed deers to deer. OED gives deers as "occasional", so not actually wrong, but on reflection deer does sound better. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Support – only quibble is you could link county in the lead sentence. Otherwise it's pretty faultless, prose is sufficient, table is appropriately formatted and so are the references. Lemonade51 (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Link added. Thanks very much Lemonade. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Source review - passed
- Formatting: No problems.
- Spotchecks: Checked refs 6, 16, 27, 38; no problems
- Completeness: No obvious sources missing
Promoting! --PresN 16:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.