Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film)/archive1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:17, 4 August 2016

List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film)

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film)/archive1

Nominator(s): FrB.TG (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another awards list of another fantastic film of 2015, which in my humble opinion, meets the FL criteria. FrB.TG (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from – jona ✉ 14:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from AJona1992

Any way of knowing Riley Andersen's age in the film?

Is that really necessary? The list stating that she is young suffices, I think.

Too many instances with the word film in the last paragraph.
Are you supposed to wikilink an actor or actress and the film every time they were nominated in the article body? – jona ✉ 01:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Normally it borders on WP:OVERLINKING, but as the table is sortable all of the entries need to be wiki-linked. FrB.TG (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments have been addressed, I looked at other similar articles and have found it to be acceptable. The list is well-written, detailed and complete, the writing is superb, and well deserving of FL status. Best – jona ✉ 14:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. FrB.TG (talk) 14:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I have been meaning to add comments for a while now, but it's just taken me some time to get here. After a quick read I believe the lead would really do well with some critical commentary, maybe just the RT consensus, as it reads a little bland and too factual. A single round up of the major aspects from any other reputed source could work too. Will add the rest of the comments in a short while.NumerounovedantTalk 08:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is fine for an awards list, which can get repetitive as it only talks about awards it received. FrB.TG (talk) 11:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC) @Numerounovedant: do you have any concern? FrB.TG (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay... I've been busy lately, however, the list looks good. I will go through it one more time before giving a final say. NumerounovedantTalk 15:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The list looks in order to me, but, since I have not added much to the review so I think it's not a place where I should be giving a verdict. Good look with nomination though, good job. NumerounovedantTalk 10:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from - Vivvt (Talk) 03:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

;Comments by Vivvt

The link for "49th highest-grossing film of all time" is incorrectly pointing to animation films where it is listed as 8th. You may want to change it to this
Use "As of July 2016" for the above sentence as rankings are most likely to change in the future.
Use "As of July 2016" for the rotten tomatoes rating as it may also change in the future.
"its direction, screenplay and the voice of Poehler" Use comma after screenplay
Need dash for "Young Actress (12 - 21)"
Fix five instances of nbsp-dash.

- Vivvt (Talk) 09:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for referring me to the correct link and the comments, Vivvt. FrB.TG (talk) 15:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this earlier. Two notes are hanging below the table. You may want to put them under "Notes" section. - Vivvt (Talk) 18:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, shifted. FrB.TG (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see your changes have been reverted with the comments. You may want to check with the editor for the reason. I dont quite get it. Lots of FLs has it that way. Not sure whats wrong with it. - Vivvt (Talk) 10:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I reverted theirs; nowhere in any article is another article transcluded. FrB.TG (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's common to transclude part of an article in another article to avoid repeating the source text and having to maintain it in two places. List of Pixar awards and nominations (feature films) transludes the awards table from many articles including List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film)#Accolades. Please stop removing the <onlyinclude>...</onlyinclude> code that is used here to allow partial transclusion. See WP:ONLYINCLUDE for how it works. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have simply removed the footnotes as the text there is not too long. Hope everything is sorted now. FrB.TG (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support All my comments have been resolved satisfactorily. - Vivvt (Talk) 03:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. FrB.TG (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support can't see any issue. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Yash! FrB.TG (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Support: Since i am the creator of List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film) and all the relevant information (which has been rewritten) that i had provided, i don't see any problem it being a FLC candidate. Nauriya (Rendezvous) 15:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Cowlibob

*Need refs for the cast and plot of the film

Budget should be production budget

We don't need to be that precise with box office figure to go to decimal points.

Strange to start a paragraph with as of. How about moving the Rotten Tomatoes sentence to bookend the previous paragraph. I would also rephrase it as " Rotten Tomatoes, a review aggregator, surveyed x reviews and judged y percent to be positive."

In the next sentence, "the voice of Poehler" sounds really odd. How about... "Poehler's voice performance received the most recognition from award groups."

Annie Awards are mentioned twice in the lead.

~~America Cinema Editors Awards should be ACE Eddie Awards~~

*Many of the entries in the awarding bodies in the award column are redirects to the actual article. Please fix.

@Cowlibob: on rechecking I think I got them all. FrB.TG (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Ref 56 needs language=Danish as well as the publisher being Danish Film Academy

~~Ref 27 has a typo~~

~~This is a better ref for Bodil Award nomination [[1]].~~

Cowlibob (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cowlibob - I have acted upon your suggestions. FrB.TG (talk) 08:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

Formatting: No issues
Spotchecks: checked refs 8, 26, 47, 71; all clear
Completeness: Refs all seem appropriate

Source review passed; this nom is good to go once Cowlibob confirms that they're satisfied their concerns have been addressed. --Pres N 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN and FrB.TG: To confirm that the last comment has been resolved. Cowlibob (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, passed. --Pres N 20:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 Source review passed; this nom is good to go once {{u|Cowlibob}} confirms that they're satisfied their concerns have been addressed. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 :{{reply to|PresN|FrB.TG}} To confirm that the last comment has been resolved. [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] ([[User talk:Cowlibob|talk]]) 20:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
+::Alright, passed. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 20:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
+{{FLCClosed|promoted}}