Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Veracruz: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
tweak |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 08:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 08:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Strong keep.''' These AfDs for ''winners'' are getting ridiculous. The XBIZ Girl/Girl Performer of the Year award is not significant according to whom? (In addition, [[WP:STUB|an article being short]] is not grounds for deletion.) '''<span style="color:{{ trim | red }};">{{ trim | Erpert }}</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:{{ trim | green }};">{{ trim | [[User talk:Erpert|blah, blah, blah...]] }}</span></sup></small> 21:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Strong keep.''' These AfDs for ''winners'' are getting ridiculous. The XBIZ Girl/Girl Performer of the Year award is not significant according to whom? (In addition, [[WP:STUB|an article being short]] is not grounds for deletion.) '''<span style="color:{{ trim | red }};">{{ trim | Erpert }}</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:{{ trim | green }};">{{ trim | [[User talk:Erpert|blah, blah, blah...]] }}</span></sup></small> 21:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' as meets PORNBIO as well as GNG, Ofcourse this !vote has absolutely nothing to do with HOTTIE & all that... |
|||
Revision as of 22:06, 1 September 2016
- Vanessa Veracruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An unremarkable porn actress with an article which almost solely consists of a nomination table. No significant RS coverage can be found. The subject fails PORNBIO as XBIZ Girl/Girl Performer of the Year award is not significant and well known. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Strong keep. These AfDs for winners are getting ridiculous. The XBIZ Girl/Girl Performer of the Year award is not significant according to whom? (In addition, an article being short is not grounds for deletion.) Erpert blah, blah, blah... 21:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as meets PORNBIO as well as GNG, Ofcourse this !vote has absolutely nothing to do with HOTTIE & all that...