Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Kramer Bussel: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:31, 31 December 2016

Rachel Kramer Bussel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are not enough sources about Bussel to show that she is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - oh come on. She's a prominent and prolific sex author widely cited by her peers (look at the Google Scholar hits) satisfying WP:AUTHOR and have had features about her in reliable sources. [1][2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

WP:Articles for deletion#Before nominating: checks and alternatives states,

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.^[a]

Notes

^ A popular retort when asking for advice on the internet is "Search the Flaming Web" (STFW).^[1] However, not everything on the web is a reliable source that can be used to prove notability of a topic.

Citations

^ "STFW". Jargon File. Retrieved 21 August 2016.

Unscintillating (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A Google Scholar snippet from AD Ross - Sexuality & Culture, 2012 - Springer states that the topic is, "...a sex writer who is particularly concerned with the question of female masochism. According to Bussel, being submissive is actually..." Unscintillating (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[2] A popular retort when asking for advice on the internet is "Search the Flaming Web" (STFW).^[1] However, not everything on the web is a reliable source that can be used to prove notability of a topic.

[1] "STFW". Jargon File. Retrieved 21 August 2016.

[a]

[1]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Keep''' - oh come on. She's a prominent and prolific sex author widely cited by her peers (look at the Google Scholar hits) satisfying [[WP:AUTHOR]] and have had features about her in reliable sources. [http://nypost.com/2015/11/12/sleeping-in-separate-beds-saved-our-relationship/][http://www.glamour.com/story/why-women-love-kink] [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 00:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Comment'''
+:{| style="background:#DDFFFF"
+|-
+|
+[[WP:Articles for deletion#Before nominating: checks and alternatives]] states,
+|-
+|
+;D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability:
+# The minimum search expected is a [https://www.google.com/ normal Google search], a [https://books.google.com/ Google Books] search, a [https://news.google.com Google News] search, and a [https://news.google.com/newspapers Google News ''archive''] search; [https://scholar.google.com/ Google Scholar] is suggested for academic subjects.{{efn|A popular retort when asking for advice on the internet is "Search the Flaming Web" (STFW).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/S/STFW.html|title=STFW|publisher=Jargon File|accessdate=21 August 2016}}</ref> However, not ''everything'' on the web is a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that can be used to prove notability of a topic.}}
+|-
+|
+'''Notes'''
+{{notelist}}
+'''Citations'''
+{{reflist}}
+|}
+:[[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''&nbsp; A Google Scholar snippet from AD Ross - Sexuality & Culture, 2012 - Springer states that the topic is, "...a sex writer who is particularly concerned with the question of female masochism. According to Bussel, being submissive is actually..."&nbsp; [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)