Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Kramer Bussel: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m signoff |
→Rachel Kramer Bussel: keep |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' - oh come on. She's a prominent and prolific sex author widely cited by her peers (look at the Google Scholar hits) satisfying [[WP:AUTHOR]] and have had features about her in reliable sources. [http://nypost.com/2015/11/12/sleeping-in-separate-beds-saved-our-relationship/][http://www.glamour.com/story/why-women-love-kink] [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 00:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - oh come on. She's a prominent and prolific sex author widely cited by her peers (look at the Google Scholar hits) satisfying [[WP:AUTHOR]] and have had features about her in reliable sources. [http://nypost.com/2015/11/12/sleeping-in-separate-beds-saved-our-relationship/][http://www.glamour.com/story/why-women-love-kink] [[User:Morbidthoughts|Morbidthoughts]] ([[User talk:Morbidthoughts|talk]]) 00:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' |
|||
:{| style="background:#DDFFFF" |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
[[WP:Articles for deletion#Before nominating: checks and alternatives]] states, |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
;D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability: |
|||
# The minimum search expected is a [https://www.google.com/ normal Google search], a [https://books.google.com/ Google Books] search, a [https://news.google.com Google News] search, and a [https://news.google.com/newspapers Google News ''archive''] search; [https://scholar.google.com/ Google Scholar] is suggested for academic subjects.{{efn|A popular retort when asking for advice on the internet is "Search the Flaming Web" (STFW).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/S/STFW.html|title=STFW|publisher=Jargon File|accessdate=21 August 2016}}</ref> However, not ''everything'' on the web is a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that can be used to prove notability of a topic.}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| |
|||
'''Notes''' |
|||
{{notelist}} |
|||
'''Citations''' |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
|} |
|||
:[[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' A Google Scholar snippet from AD Ross - Sexuality & Culture, 2012 - Springer states that the topic is, "...a sex writer who is particularly concerned with the question of female masochism. According to Bussel, being submissive is actually..." [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:31, 31 December 2016
- Rachel Kramer Bussel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are not enough sources about Bussel to show that she is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - oh come on. She's a prominent and prolific sex author widely cited by her peers (look at the Google Scholar hits) satisfying WP:AUTHOR and have had features about her in reliable sources. [1][2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment
WP:Articles for deletion#Before nominating: checks and alternatives states,
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.[a]
Notes
- ^ A popular retort when asking for advice on the internet is "Search the Flaming Web" (STFW).[1] However, not everything on the web is a reliable source that can be used to prove notability of a topic.
Citations
- Keep A Google Scholar snippet from AD Ross - Sexuality & Culture, 2012 - Springer states that the topic is, "...a sex writer who is particularly concerned with the question of female masochism. According to Bussel, being submissive is actually..." Unscintillating (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)