Jump to content

Frank-Kamenetskii theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 172: Line 172:


From numerical solution, it is found that the critical Frank-Kamentskii parameter is <math>\delta_c=3.32</math>. The system has no steady state( or explodes) for <math>\delta>\delta_c=3.32</math> and for <math>\delta<\delta_c=3.32</math>, the system goes to a steady state with very slow reaction..The maximum temperature <math>\theta_m</math> occurs at <math>\eta=0</math> and maximum critical temperature is <math>\theta_{m,c} = 1.61</math>.
From numerical solution, it is found that the critical Frank-Kamentskii parameter is <math>\delta_c=3.32</math>. The system has no steady state( or explodes) for <math>\delta>\delta_c=3.32</math> and for <math>\delta<\delta_c=3.32</math>, the system goes to a steady state with very slow reaction..The maximum temperature <math>\theta_m</math> occurs at <math>\eta=0</math> and maximum critical temperature is <math>\theta_{m,c} = 1.61</math>.



==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
* Planar solution in [[Chebfun]] solver http://www.chebfun.org/examples/ode-nonlin/BlowupFK.html


[[Category:Fluid dynamics]]
[[Category:Fluid dynamics]]

Revision as of 23:58, 19 May 2017

In combustion, Frank-Kamenetskii theory explains the thermal explosion of a homogeneous mixture of reactants, kept inside a closed vessel with constant temperature walls. It is named after a Russian scientist David A. Frank-Kamenetskii, who along with Nikolay Semenov developed the theory in the 1930s.[1][2][3][4]

Problem description[5][6][7][8]

Consider a vessel maintained at a constant temperature , containing a homogeneous reacting mixture. Let the characteristic size of the vessel be . Sine the mixture is homogeneous, the density is constant. During the initial period of ignition, the reactant concentration is negligible (see and below), thus the explosion is governed only by the energy equation. Assuming a one-step global reaction , where is the amount of heat released per unit mass of fuel consumed, and reaction rate governed by Arrhenius law, the energy equation becomes

where

Non-dimensionalization

The non-dimensional activation energy and the heat-release parameter are

The characteristic heat conduction time across the vessel is

the characteristic fuel consumption time is

and the characteristic explosion/ignition time is

Note should be made that in combustion process, typically so that . Therefore, , i.e., the fuel is consumed at much longer times when compared with ignition time, the fuel consumption is essentially negligible to study ignition/explosion. That is the reason the fuel concentration is assumed to same as the initial fuel concentration .

The non-dimensional scales are

where is the Damköhler number and is the spatial coordinate with origin at the center, for planar slab, for cylindrical vessel and for spherical vessel. With this scale, the equation becomes

Since , the exponential term can be linearized , hence

Semenov theory

Before Frank-Kamenetskii, his doctoral advisor Nikolay Semyonov(or Semenov) proposed a thermal explosion theory for a simple equation i.e., he assumed a linear function for heat conduction process instead of Laplacian operator. Semenove's equation reads as

For , the system explodes since the exponential term dominates. For , the system goes to a steady state, the system doesn't explode. In particular, Semenov found the critical Damköhler number, which is called as Frank-Kamenetskii parameter(where ) as a critical point where the system changes from steady state to explosive state. For , the solution is

At time , the system explodes.

Frank-Kamenetskii steady-state theory

The only parameter which characterizes the explosion is the Damköhler number . When is very high, conduction time is longer than the chemical reaction time and the system explodes with high temperature since there is not enough time for conduction to remove the heat. On the other hand, when is very low, heat conduction time is much faster than the chemical reaction time, such that all the heat produced by the chemical reaction is immediately conducted to the wall, thus there is no explosion, it goes to an almost steady state, Amable Liñán coined this mode as slowly reacting mode. At a critical Damköhler number the system goes from slowly reacting mode to explosive mode. Therefore, , the system is in steady state. Instead of solving the full problem to find this , Frank-Kamenetskii solved the steady state problem for various Damköhler number until the critical value, beyond which no steady solution exists. So the problem to be solved is

with boundary conditions

the second condition is due to the symmetry of the vessel. The above equation is called as Liouville–Bratu–Gelfand equation in mathematics.

Planar vessel

Frank-Kamenetskii explosion for planar vessel

For planar vessel, there is an exact solution and the equation was initially discussed by Joseph Liouville in 1853.[9] Here , then

If the transformations and , where is the maximum temperature which occurs at due to symmetry, are introduced

Integrating once and using the second boundary condition, the equation becomes

and integrating again

The above equation is the exact solution, but maximum temperature is unknown, but we have not used the boundary condition of the wall yet. Thus using the wall boundary condition at , the maximum temperature is obtained from an implicit expression,

Critical is obtained by finding the maximum point of the equation(look figure), i.e., at .

So the critical Frank-Kamentskii parameter is . The system has no steady state( or explodes) for and for , the system goes to a steady state with very slow reaction.

Cylindrical vessel

Frank-Kamenetskii explosion for cylindrical vessel

For cylindrical vessel, there is an exact solution and the equation was initially discussed by G.Bratu in 1914.[10] Though Frank-Kamentskii used numerical integration assuming there is no explicit solution, P.L. Chambre provided an exact soution in 1952[11]. Here , then

If the transformations and are introduced

The general solution is

But from the symmetry condition at the centre. Writing back in original variable, the equation reads,

But the the the original equation multiplied by is

Now subtracting the last two equation from one another leads to

This equation is easy to solve because it involves only the derivatives, so letting transforms the equation

This is a Bernoulli differential equation of order , a type of Riccati equation. The solution is

Integrating once again, we have

We have used already one boundary condition, there is one more boundary condition left, but with two constants . It turns out and are related to each other, which is obtained by substituting the above solution into the starting equation we arrive at

Therefore the solution is

Now if we use the other boundary condition , we get an equation for

The maximum value of for which solution is possible is when , so the critical Frank-Kamentskii parameter is . The system has no steady state( or explodes) for and for , the system goes to a steady state with very slow reaction..The maximum temperature occurs at

For each value of , we have two values of since is multi-valued. The maximum critical temperature is .

Spherical vessel

For spherical vessel, there is no known explicit solution, so Frank-Kamenetskii used numerical methods to find the critical value.Here , then

If the transformations and , where is the maximum temperature which occurs at due to symmetry, are introduced

The above equation is nothing but Chandrasekhar equation,[12] which appears in astrophysics describing isothermal gas sphere.

From numerical solution, it is found that the critical Frank-Kamentskii parameter is . The system has no steady state( or explodes) for and for , the system goes to a steady state with very slow reaction..The maximum temperature occurs at and maximum critical temperature is .

References

  1. ^ Frank-Kamenetskii, David A. "Towards temperature distributions in a reaction vessel and the stationary theory of thermal explosion." Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR. Vol. 18. 1938.
  2. ^ Frank-Kamenetskii, D. A. "Calculation of thermal explosion limits." Acta. Phys.-Chim USSR 10 (1939): 365.
  3. ^ Semenov, N. N. "The calculation of critical temperatures of thermal explosion." Z Phys Chem 48 (1928): 571.
  4. ^ Semenov, N. N. "On the theory of combustion processes." Z. phys. Chem 48 (1928): 571–582.
  5. ^ Linan, Amable, and Forman Arthur Williams. "Fundamental aspects of combustion." (1993).
  6. ^ Williams, Forman A. "Combustion theory." (1985).
  7. ^ Buckmaster, John David, and Geoffrey Stuart Stephen Ludford. Theory of laminar flames. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  8. ^ Buckmaster, John D., ed. The mathematics of combustion. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1985.
  9. ^ Liouville, J. "Sur l’équation aux différences partielles ." Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées (1853): 71–72
  10. ^ Bratu, G. "Sur les équations intégrales non linéaires." Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 42 (1914): 113–142.
  11. ^ Chambre, P. L. "On the Solution of the Poisson‐Boltzmann Equation with Application to the Theory of Thermal Explosions." The Journal of Chemical Physics 20.11 (1952): 1795-1797.
  12. ^ Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. An introduction to the study of stellar structure. Vol. 2. Courier Corporation, 1958.