Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Axelson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Matthew Axelson: expand rationale and respond |
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
||
:{{la|Matthew Axelson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Axelson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May |
:{{la|Matthew Axelson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Axelson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 23#{{anchorencode:Matthew Axelson}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Matthew_Axelson Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Matthew Axelson}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Matthew Axelson}}) |
||
Fails [[WP:SOLDIER]] and [[WP:1E]]. -- [[User:Irn|Irn]] ([[User talk:Irn|talk]]) 01:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
Fails [[WP:SOLDIER]] and [[WP:1E]]. -- [[User:Irn|Irn]] ([[User talk:Irn|talk]]) 01:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Weak keep''' fails [[WP:SOLDIER]], did not receive the second highest award for gallantry (Navy Cross) multiple times, but may possibly meet the GNG "significant coverage" requirement due to media. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 08:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep''' fails [[WP:SOLDIER]], did not receive the second highest award for gallantry (Navy Cross) multiple times, but may possibly meet the GNG "significant coverage" requirement due to media. [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 08:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
*:I wasn't aware of [[WP:SOLDIER]], so I've added it to the rationale, but I think that [[WP:1E]] addresses the "significant coverage", since all of that coverage was only due to one event, and neither his role in the event nor the event itself is significant enough to merit an entire article for him. -- [[User:Irn|Irn]] ([[User talk:Irn|talk]]) 13:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
*:I wasn't aware of [[WP:SOLDIER]], so I've added it to the rationale, but I think that [[WP:1E]] addresses the "significant coverage", since all of that coverage was only due to one event, and neither his role in the event nor the event itself is significant enough to merit an entire article for him. -- [[User:Irn|Irn]] ([[User talk:Irn|talk]]) 13:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 01:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Matthew Axelson]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
|||
Revision as of 01:40, 23 May 2017
- Matthew Axelson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:1E. -- Irn (talk) 01:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep fails WP:SOLDIER, did not receive the second highest award for gallantry (Navy Cross) multiple times, but may possibly meet the GNG "significant coverage" requirement due to media. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of WP:SOLDIER, so I've added it to the rationale, but I think that WP:1E addresses the "significant coverage", since all of that coverage was only due to one event, and neither his role in the event nor the event itself is significant enough to merit an entire article for him. -- Irn (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)