Friends of Real Lancashire: Difference between revisions
→Successes: +signs story - note they had to pay for signs |
a few corrections and additional refs |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Image:EnglandLancashire.png|frame|Non-metropolitan Lancashire shown in red, with the two unitary authorities in ceremonial Lancashire orange. <ref>[http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/bound_map_page.jsp?first=true&u_id=10097848&c_id=10001043 Vision of Britain] - Shire county boundaries</ref>]] |
[[Image:EnglandLancashire.png|frame|Non-metropolitan Lancashire shown in red, with the two unitary authorities in ceremonial Lancashire orange. <ref>[http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/bound_map_page.jsp?first=true&u_id=10097848&c_id=10001043 Vision of Britain] - Shire county boundaries</ref>]] |
||
The Friends of Real Lancashire are concerned to promote |
The Friends of Real Lancashire are concerned to promote what they view as the true boundaries of the county, which following the 1974 enactment of the [[Local Government Act 1972]] are no longer used for local government. <ref name=aspects>Her Majesty's Stationary Office, ''Aspects of Britain: Local Government'', (1996)</ref> <ref name=elcock>Elcock, H., ''Local Government'', (1994)</ref> Lancashire saw more upheaval than most counties, having most of its population transferred to the new counties: [[Manchester]] and south east Lancashire became part of [[Greater Manchester]]; [[Liverpool]] and south west Lancashire became part of [[Merseyside]]; [[Furness]] became part of [[Cumbria]]; and [[Warrington]] and [[Widnes]] became part of [[Cheshire]]. <ref name=arnold_baker>Arnold-Baker, C., ''Local Government Act 1972'',(1973)</ref> |
||
The boundary changes were not intended to affect loyalties but they caused concern in some areas <ref name=elcock/> <ref name=aspects /> and in practice it is the |
The boundary changes did not alter the traditional county boundaries <ref>Government statement quoted in The Times of 1 April 1974: "They are administrative areas and will not alter the traditional boundaries of counties, nor is it intended that the loyalties of people living in them will change."</ref> and were not intended to affect loyalties, but they caused concern in some areas <ref name=elcock/> <ref name=aspects /> and in practice it is the administrative boundaries <ref name=bryne>Bryne, T., ''Local Government in Britain'', (1994)</ref> <ref name=aspects /> which are now shown on maps and marked by road signs. They have also been widely adopted by the media as geographical designations, despite the fact that many within the new counties continue to regard themselves as Lancastrians. The traditional county boundaries continue to be used as the basis for organisations such as the [[Duchy of Lancaster]], [[Lancashire County Cricket Club]] and the [[Football Association]]. <ref>[http://www.lancashirefa.com/countycups/Postings/2005/09/Lancashire+FA+Senior+Cup.htm Lancashire FA Senior Cup]</ref> |
||
The area under the control of Lancashire County Council, or [[shire county]], became even smaller in 1998 when [[Blackpool]] and [[Blackburn with Darwen]] became [[unitary authorities]]. <ref>[http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1996/Uksi_19961868_en_1.htm OPSI] - ''The Lancashire (Boroughs of Blackburn and Blackpool) (Structural Change) Order 1996''</ref> Although they remain part of the [[ceremonial county]], they are often no longer mapped as part of Lancashire and "Welcome to Lancashire" road signs have been placed on their boundaries with the |
The area under the control of Lancashire County Council, or [[shire county|non-metropolitan county]], became even smaller in 1998 when [[Blackpool]] and [[Blackburn with Darwen]] became [[unitary authorities]]. <ref>[http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1996/Uksi_19961868_en_1.htm OPSI] - ''The Lancashire (Boroughs of Blackburn and Blackpool) (Structural Change) Order 1996''</ref> Although they remain part of the [[ceremonial county]], they are often no longer mapped as part of Lancashire and "Welcome to Lancashire" road signs have been placed on their boundaries with the administrative county. |
||
The group counts at least six MPs amongst its supporters and has been mentioned in [[Hansard]]. <ref name=hansard_petition>{{cite hansard|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo951204/debtext/51204-30.htm|house=House of Commons|date=4 December 1995|column=116}}</ref> It has received limited support within local government, <ref>[http://www.southlakeland.gov.uk/CIS/PDF/MINS_95_96__P_AND_R__260995.HTM South Lakeland District Council] - Minutes of meeting of the Policy and Resources Committee held on [[26 September]] [[1995]]</ref> and its campaign has also mentioned in the local press. <ref> |
The group counts at least six MPs amongst its supporters and has been mentioned in [[Hansard]]. <ref name=hansard_petition>{{cite hansard|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo951204/debtext/51204-30.htm|house=House of Commons|date=4 December 1995|column=116}}</ref> It has received limited support within local government, <ref>[http://www.southlakeland.gov.uk/CIS/PDF/MINS_95_96__P_AND_R__260995.HTM South Lakeland District Council] - Minutes of meeting of the Policy and Resources Committee held on [[26 September]] [[1995]]</ref> and its campaign has also mentioned in the local press. <ref> |
||
[http://www.thisisthelakedistrict.co.uk/entertainment/webwatch/display.var.454028.0.changing_boundaries_prompt_timely_research.php Lake District News] - Atkinson, D., ''Changing boundaries prompt timely research!'', (2004)</ref> |
[http://www.thisisthelakedistrict.co.uk/entertainment/webwatch/display.var.454028.0.changing_boundaries_prompt_timely_research.php Lake District News] - Atkinson, D., ''Changing boundaries prompt timely research!'', (2004)</ref> [[Lancashire Life]] magazine identifies itself as an enthusiastic supporter of the group and continues to cover the traditional county. <ref>[http://www.lancashirelife.co.uk/ ''Lancashire Life'' magazine]</ref> |
||
==Aims== |
==Aims== |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* The restoration of the historic boundaries of the Lancashire [[ceremonial county]] with the [[Lord-Lieutenant]] of Lancashire covering everywhere within the traditional borders. |
* The restoration of the historic boundaries of the Lancashire [[ceremonial county]] with the [[Lord-Lieutenant]] of Lancashire covering everywhere within the traditional borders. |
||
* Road signs to mark the traditional boundaries with [[Cheshire]], [[Yorkshire]], [[Westmorland]] and [[Cumberland]]. |
* Road signs to mark the traditional boundaries with [[Cheshire]], [[Yorkshire]], [[Westmorland]] and [[Cumberland]]. |
||
* The traditional boundaries to be shown on [[Ordnance Survey]] and other maps rather than the |
* The traditional boundaries to be shown on [[Ordnance Survey]] and other maps rather than the administrative boundaries. |
||
The group also campaigns to have public bodies named in accordance with traditional rather than contemporary county names e.g. NHS ambulance authority reforms. |
The group also campaigns to have public bodies named in accordance with traditional rather than contemporary county names e.g. NHS ambulance authority reforms. |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
FORL's campaign has met with limited success. In 1994 it raised a petition with 30,000 signatures calling "for the restoration of Lancashire's historic boundaries" <ref name=hansard_petition /> <ref>{{cite hansard|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199394/cmhansrd/1994-04-21/Debate-13.html|house=House of Commons|date= 21 April 1994|column=1146}}</ref> - the petition requested that the "Metropolitan Counties of Merseyside, Greater Manchester and Cumbria [sic] be abolished and the real and historic county of Lancashire be restored". In response to other suggestions of restoring former boundaries, the Government has commented that although it has no plans to restore the historic borders of counties, boundary changes which have occurred need not affect loyalties. <ref>{{cite hansard|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo960131/text/60131w20.htm|house=House of Commons|date=31 January 1996|column=821}}</ref> |
FORL's campaign has met with limited success. In 1994 it raised a petition with 30,000 signatures calling "for the restoration of Lancashire's historic boundaries" <ref name=hansard_petition /> <ref>{{cite hansard|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199394/cmhansrd/1994-04-21/Debate-13.html|house=House of Commons|date= 21 April 1994|column=1146}}</ref> - the petition requested that the "Metropolitan Counties of Merseyside, Greater Manchester and Cumbria [sic] be abolished and the real and historic county of Lancashire be restored". In response to other suggestions of restoring former boundaries, the Government has commented that although it has no plans to restore the historic borders of counties, boundary changes which have occurred need not affect loyalties. <ref>{{cite hansard|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo960131/text/60131w20.htm|house=House of Commons|date=31 January 1996|column=821}}</ref> |
||
The group succeeded in having signs erected near [[Clitheroe]], [[Nelson, Lancashire|Nelson]] and [[Colne]] marking the traditional border with the [[West Riding of Yorkshire]], on roads which are currently managed by [[Lancashire County Council]]. The signs were paid for at no expense to |
The group succeeded in having signs erected near [[Clitheroe]], [[Nelson, Lancashire|Nelson]] and [[Colne]] marking the traditional border with the [[West Riding of Yorkshire]], on roads which are currently managed by [[Lancashire County Council]]. The signs were paid for at no expense to taxpayers.<ref>[http://archive.cravenherald.co.uk/2000/1/8/157879.html Ancient boundary signs to be revived] Telegraph & Argus. January 8, 2000.</ref> |
||
In 2001, the leader of the council was presented with a framed map, created by the group, depicting the historic boundaries. It was put on display at County Hall <ref>[http://archive.thisislancashire.co.uk/2001/1/18/697371.html This is Lancashire] - ''County map shows 'real' borders'', (2001)</ref> |
In 2001, the leader of the council was presented with a framed map, created by the group, depicting the historic boundaries. It was put on display at County Hall <ref>[http://archive.thisislancashire.co.uk/2001/1/18/697371.html This is Lancashire] - ''County map shows 'real' borders'', (2001)</ref> |
||
Revision as of 20:38, 28 September 2006
The Friends of Real Lancashire are a pressure group affiliated to the Association of British Counties calling for the wider recognition of the historic boundaries of Lancashire. Its chairman is Chris Dawson and its president is Janet Anderson MP.
Background
The Friends of Real Lancashire are concerned to promote what they view as the true boundaries of the county, which following the 1974 enactment of the Local Government Act 1972 are no longer used for local government. [3] [4] Lancashire saw more upheaval than most counties, having most of its population transferred to the new counties: Manchester and south east Lancashire became part of Greater Manchester; Liverpool and south west Lancashire became part of Merseyside; Furness became part of Cumbria; and Warrington and Widnes became part of Cheshire. [5]
The boundary changes did not alter the traditional county boundaries [6] and were not intended to affect loyalties, but they caused concern in some areas [4] [3] and in practice it is the administrative boundaries [7] [3] which are now shown on maps and marked by road signs. They have also been widely adopted by the media as geographical designations, despite the fact that many within the new counties continue to regard themselves as Lancastrians. The traditional county boundaries continue to be used as the basis for organisations such as the Duchy of Lancaster, Lancashire County Cricket Club and the Football Association. [8]
The area under the control of Lancashire County Council, or non-metropolitan county, became even smaller in 1998 when Blackpool and Blackburn with Darwen became unitary authorities. [9] Although they remain part of the ceremonial county, they are often no longer mapped as part of Lancashire and "Welcome to Lancashire" road signs have been placed on their boundaries with the administrative county.
The group counts at least six MPs amongst its supporters and has been mentioned in Hansard. [10] It has received limited support within local government, [11] and its campaign has also mentioned in the local press. [12] Lancashire Life magazine identifies itself as an enthusiastic supporter of the group and continues to cover the traditional county. [13]
Aims
FORL has the following aims:
- The restoration of the historic boundaries of the Lancashire ceremonial county with the Lord-Lieutenant of Lancashire covering everywhere within the traditional borders.
- Road signs to mark the traditional boundaries with Cheshire, Yorkshire, Westmorland and Cumberland.
- The traditional boundaries to be shown on Ordnance Survey and other maps rather than the administrative boundaries.
The group also campaigns to have public bodies named in accordance with traditional rather than contemporary county names e.g. NHS ambulance authority reforms.
Successes
FORL's campaign has met with limited success. In 1994 it raised a petition with 30,000 signatures calling "for the restoration of Lancashire's historic boundaries" [10] [14] - the petition requested that the "Metropolitan Counties of Merseyside, Greater Manchester and Cumbria [sic] be abolished and the real and historic county of Lancashire be restored". In response to other suggestions of restoring former boundaries, the Government has commented that although it has no plans to restore the historic borders of counties, boundary changes which have occurred need not affect loyalties. [15]
The group succeeded in having signs erected near Clitheroe, Nelson and Colne marking the traditional border with the West Riding of Yorkshire, on roads which are currently managed by Lancashire County Council. The signs were paid for at no expense to taxpayers.[16]
In 2001, the leader of the council was presented with a framed map, created by the group, depicting the historic boundaries. It was put on display at County Hall [17]
The Royal Mail no longer require the use of their former postal counties when addressing letters and instead use the postcode and post town to direct mail. As part of their flexible addressing policy, those within the historic boundaries of Lancashire who were included in other postal counties, if they prefer, may now include "Lancashire" as part of their address. Where a county is provided however, it will ignored and to this end, an alias file supplement to the Postcode Address File cross references county and other postally-not-required information to the correct postal address. [18]
Lancashire Day
As part of its campaign the group has adopted 27th November as Lancashire Day, this being the day in 1295 when Lancashire sent its first representatives to Parliament. It was first celebrated in 1996 with the Loyal Toast to "The Queen, Duke of Lancaster". Lancashire Day paralleled the similar Yorkshire Day, first held in 1975.
Lancashire Day has been widely publicised, including mentions on the BBC website. [19] It has also been supported by both district councils [20] [21] and the county council. [22]
References
- ^ Vision of Britian - Ancient county boundaries
- ^ Vision of Britain - Shire county boundaries
- ^ a b c Her Majesty's Stationary Office, Aspects of Britain: Local Government, (1996)
- ^ a b Elcock, H., Local Government, (1994)
- ^ Arnold-Baker, C., Local Government Act 1972,(1973)
- ^ Government statement quoted in The Times of 1 April 1974: "They are administrative areas and will not alter the traditional boundaries of counties, nor is it intended that the loyalties of people living in them will change."
- ^ Bryne, T., Local Government in Britain, (1994)
- ^ Lancashire FA Senior Cup
- ^ OPSI - The Lancashire (Boroughs of Blackburn and Blackpool) (Structural Change) Order 1996
- ^ a b http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo951204/debtext/51204-30.htm. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 4 December 1995. col. 116.
{{cite book}}:|chapter-url=missing title (help) - ^ South Lakeland District Council - Minutes of meeting of the Policy and Resources Committee held on 26 September 1995
- ^ Lake District News - Atkinson, D., Changing boundaries prompt timely research!, (2004)
- ^ Lancashire Life magazine
- ^ http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199394/cmhansrd/1994-04-21/Debate-13.html. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 21 April 1994. col. 1146.
{{cite book}}:|chapter-url=missing title (help) - ^ http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199596/cmhansrd/vo960131/text/60131w20.htm. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 31 January 1996. col. 821.
{{cite book}}:|chapter-url=missing title (help) - ^ Ancient boundary signs to be revived Telegraph & Argus. January 8, 2000.
- ^ This is Lancashire - County map shows 'real' borders, (2001)
- ^ Royal Mail, Address Management Guide, (2004)
- ^ BBC - Lancastrians' pride in heritage
- ^ Lancaster City Council - Meeting of the Lancaster City Council. 17 December 2003 (PDF)
- ^ Wyre Borough Council - Lanky Rules OK On Wyre’s Lancashire Day
- ^ Lancashire County Council - News: Lancashire Day Fun