User talk:Bobsmith319

Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope your time here is enjoyable and productive. Your comment regarding pregnancy was rude and breaks the policy of civility on WP. The image has been discussed many times and found perfectly acceptable Maustrauser 01:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

You may not remove warnings from your talk page. I have reverted it. Lamont A Cranston 22:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page. You are most welcome to put explanations for your actions, but removal is not acceptable. May I also ask that you sign your posts with four tildes on your editing remarks, such as you did for Pregnancy Image 26 weeks. Maustrauser 22:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Talk:Pregnancy

Your recent edit to (diff) was reverted by in an attempt to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --205.188.117.10 20:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

How dare you! I was trying to make Wikipedia better by trying to make it safe for all! This not considered vandalism this helping other users to wake up, and delete this image! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bobsmith319 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Please see "Wikipedia is not censored" at Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for a clarification of Wikipedia policies on this matter. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Please cease removing images from pregnancy. This issue has been debated and a reasonable concensus achieved on the discussion pages. Maustrauser 02:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia says deleting images is allowed, and I will if I find crude images such as that one. --User:Bobsmith319 02:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)bobsmith319

Indeed it does allow the deleting of images. However, the image in question has general concensus that it is acceptable and educational. Your deeming of naked pregnant women as 'crude' does not have general support by the editors of the pregnancy article. Maustrauser 03:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Three Revert Rule - 3RR

As a new user, you may not be aware of the three revert rule. If you breach this rule in your editing you may be banned for a period from editing WP. You may wish to read this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:3RR Maustrauser 03:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

There are many people who are in favor of removing this inapropriate image. You do not have the right as a veteran wikipedia memeber to boss others around.

AfD Nomination: CNA Financial Corporation

An article that you have been involved in editing, CNA Financial Corporation, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNA Financial Corporation. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Photos of Mount Prospect, Illinois

I saw a message that you posted about uploading photographs. If you would like to upload photos of Mount Prospect, Illinois, please visit http://commons.wikimedia.org and upload them there. They should have good descriptive names like "Mount_Prospect_Public_Library_Sept_22_2006.jpg" rather than "photo3.jpg". Then the pictures can be used in the English Wikipedia and those in other languages. You might enjoy visiting the Spanish Wikipedia at http://es.wikipedia.org or the French Wikipedia at http://fr.wikipedia.org --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)