Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Shah (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
reply |
Divshirsat12 (talk | contribs) I have shared my reasons for not to delete this page. |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete.''' Shah is a charlatan preying on ignorance and gullibility. He claims to have an MD (Homeopathy), an oxymoron because no [[Higher education accreditation|accredited university]] provides such a degree, which dishonors the rigor of a true MD. The article contains weak, non-expert, one-sided sources, and is a disguise behind apparent research to blatantly promote his online business at https://www.askdrshah.com/online.aspx where an "interview" begins with step 1, "Make payment". I removed this personal website per [[WP:ADMASK]]. The article should be nominated for speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD]] under numerous criteria, including "unambiguous advertising" and "blatant hoax". --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 14:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete.''' Shah is a charlatan preying on ignorance and gullibility. He claims to have an MD (Homeopathy), an oxymoron because no [[Higher education accreditation|accredited university]] provides such a degree, which dishonors the rigor of a true MD. The article contains weak, non-expert, one-sided sources, and is a disguise behind apparent research to blatantly promote his online business at https://www.askdrshah.com/online.aspx where an "interview" begins with step 1, "Make payment". I removed this personal website per [[WP:ADMASK]]. The article should be nominated for speedy deletion per [[WP:CSD]] under numerous criteria, including "unambiguous advertising" and "blatant hoax". --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 14:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Was AfD'd in 2014, and nothing notable has happened related to him since. [[User:Natureium|Natureium]] ([[User talk:Natureium|talk]]) 17:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Was AfD'd in 2014, and nothing notable has happened related to him since. [[User:Natureium|Natureium]] ([[User talk:Natureium|talk]]) 17:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''', because he seems to be notable - and as mentioned above, there are verifiable sources. Since he is promoting online homeopathy treatement there is nothing wrong in it. He has done a lot of research in homeopathy and a doctor like him deserves a wikipedia page. I think we should consider his contribution. --[[User:Divshirsat12|Divshirsat12]] 11:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:31, 26 September 2017
AfDs for this article:
- Rajesh Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sufficiently notable (esp. lacking RS coverage). Delete and salt. Alexbrn (talk) 04:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep this article is strongly suggested since the references mentioned are genuine. Limca Book of Records is a verifiable source and so are the articles on Sify.com and Rediff.com. Additionally his articles published in the Journal of Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic Physicians, USA are a strong evidence of his written contributions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohanpednekar38 (talk) 11:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)— Rohanpednekar38 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete. Shah is a charlatan preying on ignorance and gullibility. He claims to have an MD (Homeopathy), an oxymoron because no accredited university provides such a degree, which dishonors the rigor of a true MD. The article contains weak, non-expert, one-sided sources, and is a disguise behind apparent research to blatantly promote his online business at https://www.askdrshah.com/online.aspx where an "interview" begins with step 1, "Make payment". I removed this personal website per WP:ADMASK. The article should be nominated for speedy deletion per WP:CSD under numerous criteria, including "unambiguous advertising" and "blatant hoax". --Zefr (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Was AfD'd in 2014, and nothing notable has happened related to him since. Natureium (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, because he seems to be notable - and as mentioned above, there are verifiable sources. Since he is promoting online homeopathy treatement there is nothing wrong in it. He has done a lot of research in homeopathy and a doctor like him deserves a wikipedia page. I think we should consider his contribution. --Divshirsat12 11:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)