Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Mailer diablo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:42, 11 October 2006

A note

I am a very small editor to think of such big issues. I wish him all the best. --Bhadani 18:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a number of well considered comments by fellow-wikipedians. This gave me courage to participate in the discussion. I thank you all. --Bhadani 17:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your encouragement, and participation in the discussion. I really appreciate it! :) - Mailer Diablo 18:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to support you as no one has replied to my comments. However, I found that you had withdrawn. I trust that you shall continue to hold your views that wikipedia requires good writers and editors, and each administrator should be able to write if not 1Fa at least few good articles. In the ultimate analysis, we have come here to write and build an encyclopedia, and all others issues are secondary. I think that editors who feel inhibited at the prospect of writing and adding real encyclopedic contents shall not feel inhibited at such suggestions. If they can not write, they do not have any business to be around at least with administrative tools. Wikipedia is not a social club, it is a serious business of building an encyclopedia. --Bhadani 15:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :I saw a number of well considered comments by fellow-wikipedians. This gave me courage to participate in the discussion. I thank you all. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 17:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 :: Thanks for your encouragement, and participation in the discussion. I really appreciate it! :) - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer&nbsp;]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo/D|D]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo|iablo]] 18:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
+:::I was about to support you as no one has replied to my comments. However, I found that you had withdrawn. I trust that you shall continue to hold your views that wikipedia requires good writers and editors, and each administrator should be able to write if not 1Fa at least few good articles. In the ultimate analysis, we have come here to write and build an encyclopedia, and all others issues are secondary. I think that editors who feel inhibited at the prospect of writing and adding real encyclopedic contents shall not feel inhibited at such suggestions. If they can not write, they do not have any business to be around at least with administrative tools. Wikipedia is not a social club, it is a serious business of building an encyclopedia. --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 15:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)