Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 13: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[The Pee Tanks]]: closing (del. endorsed) |
→[[Pro Wrestling Unplugged]]: closing (del. endorsed) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
====[[Pro Wrestling Unplugged]]==== |
|||
A professional wrestling organization now in its second year had it's account deleted when either members or fan of a rival organization posted a delete request. The organization has had several firsts in the industry of professional wrestling, as well as superstars who compete internationally and who are currently featured on WWE and TNA television. Several other pro wrestling organizations are listed in Wikipedia. I humbly ask that you review this deletion. - [[User:Psphenom|Psphenom]] 01:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*Side note: I have a registered account, but the User:PSPhenom link I placed in does not seem to point to anything. |
|||
*You should sign your comments with four tildes: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> which should solve the problem. In any case, I corrected your user name to what appears in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_October_13&action=history edit history]. Also, we discussed this just a couple of days ago [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ADeletion_review%2FLog%2F2006_October_2&diff=80037617&oldid=80036974]. Absent new information, '''Speedy close'''. ~ [[User:Trialsanderrors|trialsanderrors]] 06:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse''' [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Unplugged]] and speedy close as recently debated per above. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> 09:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep deleted''' per AfD. [[User:Danny Lilithborne|Danny Lilithborne]] 10:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''endorse''' and speedy close per JzG --[[User:Storkk|Storkk]] 16:01, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse''' per AfD -- [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 04:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''' For heaven's sake Psphenom, are you even listening to anyone? The article wasn't deleted because people hated PWU; it's because all you're doing is making wild claims of [[WP:N|notability]] and doing ''nothing'' to [[WP:V|verify]] these claims. Just because Wiki has articles on other wrestling promotions means every promotion should get one; the promotions on Wikipedia are notable and said notability is sourced and verifiable. Unless you can show evidence that PWU is notable, it doesn't warrant an article. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|contribs]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></font> 21:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::'''KEEP ARTICLE''': The people who have endorsed this article's deletion know NOTHING about professional wrestling. If they did, they would know that PWU is a major wrestling organization that clearly deserves an article. Whether PWU deserves a Wikipedia article is not debatable. It is not one of those topics that is right on the line between warranting an article and not warranting an article. It clearly, absolutely, and most certainly is notable enough to have an article. {{unsigned|64.12.116.14}} |
|||
:::It's '''not our job''' to know much about professional wrestling, actually. That's why the article ''itself'' needs to make clear why its topic is encyclopedic, so we don't all have to be experts in everything. If you post reliable, verifiable, ''external'' sources about PWU, I'm sure people will come around to supporting your article's inclusion. In the absence of that, however, you're going to keep getting the same answers. The responsibility is on the article/article creator to do the homework if encyclopedic merit is questioned. -- ''[[User:Nae'blis|nae]]'[[User_talk:Nae'blis|blis]]'' 13:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::''"The people who have endorsed this article's deletion know NOTHING about professional wrestling."'' Thank you, you're too kind. --[[User:Samuel Blanning|Sam Blanning]]<sup>[[User talk:Samuel Blanning|(talk)]]</sup> 17:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''' per AfD. [[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 07:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
====[[Vamp star]]==== |
====[[Vamp star]]==== |
||
Revision as of 15:34, 18 October 2006
- Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 October)
13 October 2006
Was a musical band that was deleted for non-notability. The author of the arricle, Rob gray, believes the band merits an entry on Wikipedia, so I'm helping to create this review for him. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 03:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep deleted. If the band is notable, it sure isn't shown here. - Lucky 6.9 04:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- endorse deletion. AFAICT, this is pretty clear-cut. In spirit of helping the article's author, I think nom should point out that we have a notability criteria guideline for music. To make this credible, Rob gray should show how Vamp star meets it. --Storkk 15:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)