Jump to content

Template:Article Rescue Squadron Code of Conduct: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 830148192 by Dream Focus (talk) Nothing pointy about it. The only reason to revert it would be if you intend to violate CANVASS.
You are not a member of this wikiproject, nor do any other wikiprojects have that. There is no canvassing, despite your ridiculous accusations elsewhere
Line 4: Line 4:
<center>'''<big>Project Code of conduct</big>'''</center>
<center>'''<big>Project Code of conduct</big>'''</center>
[[File:Rescuesquad - No text.png|frameless|150px|right]]
[[File:Rescuesquad - No text.png|frameless|150px|right]]
* Please note that '''WikiProject [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|Article Rescue Squadron]]''' is a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|Wikiproject]] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion#Straw poll guidelines|!votes]], nor about vote-stacking. Do not violate the [[WP:CANVASS|policy on canvassing]]. If you comment in a deletion discussion after seeing a notice about it here, you should disclose that you came to the discussion from here.
* Please note that '''WikiProject [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|Article Rescue Squadron]]''' is a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|Wikiproject]] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion#Straw poll guidelines|!votes]], nor about vote-stacking.
* '''Focus on [[Wikipedia:Be bold|improving]] content.''' For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] by adding [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable-source]] [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|references]] with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
* '''Focus on [[Wikipedia:Be bold|improving]] content.''' For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] by adding [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable-source]] [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|references]] with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
* '''Show the light.''' If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]]. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.
* '''Show the light.''' If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]]. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.

Revision as of 19:31, 13 March 2018

Project Code of conduct
  • Please note that WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron is a Wikiproject intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting !votes, nor about vote-stacking.
  • Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
  • Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.

See also