User talk:Olsen24

Your Orion 7 image

A very recent picture of the Orion 7 isn't needed. If, by your standards, "we need to show the latest look of retired buses," then why are there pictures of MTA Bus RTSs from private companies before they were repainted? Leave the image alone; your standards are already made redundant by images already on the page... Mtattrain (talk) 15:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

@Mtattrain: The privately owned RTS's is a separate thing. If there was another recent Orion 7 image that wasn't mine, i would use it but that isnt the case. Olsen24 (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

> It is not really a separate thing. Both issues are regarding how buses appeared in the past versus how they appeared just before retirement. You seem to be arguing for showing buses how they appeared just before retirement; in that case, why aren't you updating those images too? (not to say that you should, because such updates are unnecessary, but I hope you see the point...) Mtattrain (talk) 22:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

> Looks like old habits die hard, right @Nickgarbo:/Olsen24?

I did not create a sockpuppet to edit war with you. You already got me blocked, so congratulations. Now leave me alone? Nickgarbo (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Mtattrain (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Long term pattern of edit warring and failure to discuss

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You continue to be cited for edit warring. With more than 2,000 edits, you have never posted to an article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for my error. You have in fact used article talk pages in 2018. I wouldn't undo the block on this basis, though, unless you can commit to a change of your behavior in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)