Talk:Operation Masher

Unnecessary Reverts without a good cause is vandalism

Noticed a big change that happened, in which no justification seems to be given except "reverted to last good edit".66.229.17.212 (talk) 03:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

The Viet Cong claim they evaded the operation is as correct as the Allies claiming operational success. No ref is given that says that the operation was an Allied strategic failure. The C-123 is included in the aircraft shot down, it does dot merit separate mention in the Infobox. We do not list in the Infobox artillery rounds fired nor comments like "Primarily small-arms and a few 12.7mm weapons. Including "Probably Includes Civilians Listed As Enemy KIA" is POV pushing. Changing "counting 127 PAVN bodies after the battle" to "claiming 127 alleged PAVN were killed after the battle" is deliberately misleading and incorrect change.Mztourist (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

okay should have provided that reason initially, i don't know if other users agree to it or not since nobody particularly seems to care so much or don't want to dispute this. but no need to undo everything else which is cited, no need to WP:GAME or try to roll back edits since you aren't an admin. 66.229.17.212 (talk) 04:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

My explanations are clear, do you have any other comments to make before I revert you? Mztourist (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

They are not clear at all, nobody reads your mind. this isn't even the issue I'm raising, delete that part then if you feel so strongly about it, but completely changing everything else is not justified when you delete cited content. you are being a bit crafty there with this blatant changes while hiding behind one or two reasons, i don't care what kind of changes you make but reverting much more than the reasons you justified is WP:DISRUPTIVE. go read the guidelines and debate individual points if you are still feeling that emotional about it. 66.229.17.212 (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2018 (UTC)