Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mountain Witch: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:39, 28 October 2018

The Mountain Witch

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For preceding 12 years this article on a commercial product has had only one source: a non-RS link to a message board. A standard BEFORE (JSTOR, newspapers.com, Google News, Google Books) fails to find any additional sources. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This Role-playing Game was multiply reviewed, satisfying NBOOK, and is also cited repeatedly for its influence in the field in Designers & Dragons, Volume 4. (Per policy, Books should not be discussed according to NPRODUCT). Inappropriate nomination; AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Newimpartial (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide evidence of "multiple reviews" in RS per our standard requirement that sources must be demonstrated, not just asserted? Also, I am unable to find an entry for this in "Designers & Dragons, Volume 4" - can you please provide a page number for verification? Chetsford (talk) 20:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page refences are 183, 252, 290 and 293. Next time, perhaps, consult the index. ;) Newimpartial (talk)

Thanks, I'm not seeing it but - in any case - can you please provide evidence of "multiple reviews" in RS? Or was it just that one? Chetsford (talk) 22:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 20:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 20:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ::Can you please provide evidence of {{xt|"multiple reviews"}} in RS per our standard requirement that sources must be demonstrated, not just asserted? Also, I am unable to find an entry for this in "Designers & Dragons, Volume 4" - can you please provide a page number for verification? [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 20:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 :::The page refences are 183, 252, 290 and 293. Next time, perhaps, consult the index. ;) [[User:Newimpartial|Newimpartial]] ([[User talk:Newimpartial|talk]])
+:::Thanks, I'm not seeing it but - in any case - can you please provide evidence of {{xt|"multiple reviews"}} in RS? Or was it just that one? [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 22:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Popular culture|list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 20:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Martial arts|list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 20:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)</small>