Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m Michael Hardy moved page Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture to Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], the ''' |
In [[mathematics]], the '''Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture''' is a [[restricted representation|restriction]] problem in the [[representation of a Lie group|representation theory of real or p-adic Lie groups]] posed by Wee Teck Gan, [[Benedict Gross]], and [[Dipendra Prasad]].<ref>{{Citation | last1=Gan | first1=Wee Teck | last2=Gross | first2=Benedict H. | last3=Prasad | first3=Dipendra | title=Symplectic local root numbers, central critical L-values, and restriction problems in the representation theory of classical groups | mr=3202556 | year=2012 | journal=[[Astérisque]] | isbn=978-2-85629-348-5 | volume=346 | pages=1–109}}</ref> The problem originated from a conjecture of Gross and Prasad for [[orthogonal group|special orthogonal groups]] but was later generalized to include all four [[classical groups]]. In the cases considered, it is known that the [[Multiplicity-one theorem|multiplicity of the restrictions is at most one]] and the conjecture describes when the multiplicity is precisely one.<ref>{{Citation | last1=Aizenbud| first1=Avraham | last2=Gourevitch | first2=Dmitry | last3=Rallis | first3=Stephen | last4= Schiffmann | first4=Gérard | title=Multiplicity-one theorems | year=2010 | journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] | volume=172 | issue=2 | pages=1407–1434 | mr=2680495 }}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last=Sun | first=Binyong | title=Multiplicity-one theorems for Fourier–Jacobi models | year=2012 | journal=[[American Journal of Mathematics]] | doi=10.1353/ajm.2012.0044 | volume=134 | issue=6 | pages=1655–1678}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last=Sun | first=Binyong | title=Multiplicity-one theorems: the Archimedean case | year=2012 | journal=Annals of Mathematics | mr=2874638 | volume=175 | issue=1 | pages=23–44}}</ref> |
||
==Motivation== |
==Motivation== |
||
A motivating example is the following classical branching problem in the theory of [[Compact group#Compact Lie groups|compact Lie groups]]. Let <math>\pi</math> be an [[irreducible representation|irreducible]] finite dimensional representation of the compact [[unitary group]] <math>U(n)</math>, and consider its restriction to the naturally embedded subgroup <math>U(n-1)</math>. It is known that this restriction is multiplicity-free, but one may ask precisely which irreducible representations of <math>U(n-1)</math> occur in the restriction. |
A motivating example is the following classical branching problem in the theory of [[Compact group#Compact Lie groups|compact Lie groups]]. Let <math>\pi</math> be an [[irreducible representation|irreducible]] finite dimensional representation of the compact [[unitary group]] <math>U(n)</math>, and consider its restriction to the naturally embedded subgroup <math>U(n-1)</math>. It is known that this restriction is multiplicity-free, but one may ask precisely which irreducible representations of <math>U(n-1)</math> occur in the restriction. |
||
By the [[Theorem of the highest weight| |
By the [[Theorem of the highest weight|Cartan–Weyl theory of highest weights]], there is a classification of the irreducible representations of <math>U(n)</math> via their [[Weight (representation_theory)#Highest weight|highest weights]] which are in natural bijection with sequences of integers <math>\underline{a} = (a_1 \leq a_2 \leq \cdots \leq a_n)</math>. |
||
Now suppose that <math>\pi</math> has highest weight <math>a</math>. Then an irreducible representation <math>\tau</math> of <math>U(n-1)</math> with highest weight <math>\underline{b}</math> occurs in the restriction of <math>\pi</math> to <math>U(n-1)</math> (viewed as a subgroup of <math>U(n)</math>) if and only if <math>\underline{a}</math> and <math>b</math> are interlacing, i.e. <math>a_1 \leq b_1 \leq a_2 \leq b_2 \leq \ |
Now suppose that <math>\pi</math> has highest weight <math>a</math>. Then an irreducible representation <math>\tau</math> of <math>U(n-1)</math> with highest weight <math>\underline{b}</math> occurs in the restriction of <math>\pi</math> to <math>U(n-1)</math> (viewed as a subgroup of <math>U(n)</math>) if and only if <math>\underline{a}</math> and <math>b</math> are interlacing, i.e. <math>a_1 \leq b_1 \leq a_2 \leq b_2 \leq \cdots \leq b_{n-1} \leq a_n</math>.<ref>{{citation|first=Hermann|last=Weyl|authorlink=Hermann Weyl|title=The classical groups|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=1946}}</ref> |
||
The |
The Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture then considers the analogous restriction problem for other classical groups.<ref>{{Citation | last=Gan | first=Wee Teck | title=Recent progress on the Gross-Prasad conjecture | year=2014 | journal=Acta Mathematica Vietnamica | doi=10.1007/s40306-014-0047-2 | issn=2315-4144 | volume=39 | issue=1 | pages=11–33}}</ref> |
||
==Statement== |
==Statement== |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Setup=== |
===Setup=== |
||
Let <math>V</math> be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field <math>k</math> not of [[characteristic (algebra)|characteristic]] <math>2</math> equipped with a non-degenerate [[sesquilinear form]] that is <math>\ |
Let <math>V</math> be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field <math>k</math> not of [[characteristic (algebra)|characteristic]] <math>2</math> equipped with a non-degenerate [[sesquilinear form]] that is <math>\varepsilon</math>-symmetric (i.e. <math>\varepsilon = 1</math> if the form is [[Symmetric bilinear form|symmetric]] and <math>\varepsilon = -1</math> if the form is skew-symmetric. Let <math>W</math> be a non-degenerate subspace of <math>V</math> such that <math>V = W \oplus W^\perp</math> of dimension <math>(\varepsilon + 1)/2</math>. Then let <math>G = G(V) \times G(W)</math>, where <math>G(V)</math> is the [[Unitary group#Indefinite forms|unitary group preserving the form on <math>V</math>]], and let <math>H = \Delta G(W)</math> be the [[diagonal subgroup]] of <math>G(W)</math>. |
||
Let <math>\pi = \pi_1 \boxtimes \pi_2</math> be an irreducible smooth representation of <math>G</math> and let <math>\nu</math> be either the [[trivial representation]] (the "Bessel case") or the [[Metaplectic group|Weil representation]] (the " |
Let <math>\pi = \pi_1 \boxtimes \pi_2</math> be an irreducible smooth representation of <math>G</math> and let <math>\nu</math> be either the [[trivial representation]] (the "Bessel case") or the [[Metaplectic group|Weil representation]] (the "Fourier–Jacobi case"). |
||
Let <math>\ |
Let <math>\varphi = \varphi_1 \times \varphi_2</math> be a generic [[Local Langlands conjectures#Local Langlands conjectures for other groups|L-parameter]] for <math>G = G(V) \times G(W)</math>, and let <math>\Pi_\varphi</math> be the associated Vogan L-packet. |
||
===Local |
===Local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture=== |
||
If <math>\ |
If <math>\varphi</math> is a local L-parameter for <math>G</math>, then |
||
:<math>\sum_{\text{relevant } \pi \in \Pi_\ |
:<math>\sum_{\text{relevant } \pi \in \Pi_\varphi} \dim \operatorname{Hom}_H (\pi \otimes \overline{\nu}, \mathbb{C}) = 1</math>. |
||
Letting <math>\eta_{\mathrm{GP}}</math> be the "distinguished character" defined in terms of the [[Langlands–Deligne local constant]], then furthermore |
Letting <math>\eta_{\mathrm{GP}}</math> be the "distinguished character" defined in terms of the [[Langlands–Deligne local constant]], then furthermore |
||
:<math>\ |
:<math>\operatorname{Hom}_H (\pi(\varphi, \eta) \otimes \overline{\nu}, \mathbb{C}) \neq 0</math> if and only if <math>\eta = \eta_{\mathrm{GP}}</math>. |
||
===Global Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture=== |
===Global Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture=== |
||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
The following are equivalent: |
The following are equivalent: |
||
# The period interval <math>P_H</math> is nonzero when restricted to <math>\pi</math>. |
# The period interval <math>P_H</math> is nonzero when restricted to <math>\pi</math>. |
||
# For all places <math>v</math>, the local Hom space <math>\ |
# For all places <math>v</math>, the local Hom space <math>\operatorname{Hom}_{H(F_v)}(\pi_v, \nu_v) \neq 0</math> and <math>L_E(1/2, \pi_1 \times \pi_2) \neq 0</math>. |
||
==Current status== |
==Current status== |
||
===Local |
===Local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture=== |
||
In a series of four papers between 2010 and 2012, [[Jean-Loup Waldspurger]] proved the local Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for [[tempered representation]]s of orthogonal groups over [[p-adic number|p-adic fields]].<ref>{{Citation | last=Waldspurger | first=Jean-Loup | title=Une Formule intégrale reliée à la conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad. | year=2012 | journal=[[Compositio Mathematica]]| volume=146 | pages= |
In a series of four papers between 2010 and 2012, [[Jean-Loup Waldspurger]] proved the local Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for [[tempered representation]]s of orthogonal groups over [[p-adic number|p-adic fields]].<ref>{{Citation | last=Waldspurger | first=Jean-Loup | title=Une Formule intégrale reliée à la conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad. | year=2012 | journal=[[Compositio Mathematica]]| volume=146 | pages=1180–1290}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last=Waldspurger | first=Jean-Loup | title=Une Formule intégrale reliée à la conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad, 2ème partie: extension aux représentations tempérées. | year=2012 | journal=Astérisque | volume=347 | pages=171-311}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last=Waldspurger | first=Jean-Loup | title=La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les représentations tempérées des groupes spéciaux orthogonaux. | year=2012 | journal=Astérisque | volume=347 | pages=103–166}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last=Waldspurger | first=Jean-Loup | title=Calcul d'une valeur d'un facteur epsilon par une formule intégrale. | year=2012 | journal=Astérisque | volume=347}}</ref> In 2012, [[Colette Moeglin]] and Waldspurger then proved the local Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for generic non-tempered representations of orthogonal groups over p-adic fields.<ref>{{Citation | last1=Moeglin | first1=Colette | last2=Waldspurger | first2=Jean-Loup | title=La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les groupes spéciaux orthogonaux: le cas général | year=2012 | journal=Astérisque | volume=347}}</ref> |
||
In his 2013 thesis, Raphaël Beuzart-Plessis proved the local |
In his 2013 thesis, Raphaël Beuzart-Plessis proved the local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for the tempered representations of unitary groups in the p-adic Hermitian case under the same hypotheses needed to establish the [[local Langlands conjecture]].<ref>{{Citation | last=Beuzart-Plessis| first=Raphaël | title=La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les représentations tempérées des groupes unitaires | year=2012 | journal=PhD thesis}}</ref> |
||
===Global |
===Global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture=== |
||
In a series of papers between 2004 and 2009, David Ginzburg, Dihua Jiang, and [[Stephen Rallis]] showed the (1) implies (2) direction of the global |
In a series of papers between 2004 and 2009, David Ginzburg, Dihua Jiang, and [[Stephen Rallis]] showed the (1) implies (2) direction of the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture.<ref>{{Citation | last1=Ginzburg | first1=David | last2=Jiang | first2=Dihua | last3=Rallis | first3=Stephen | title=On the nonvanishing of the central value of the Rankin–Selberg L-functions. | year=2004 | journal=[[Journal of the American Mathematical Society]] | volume=17 | issue=3 | pages=679-722}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Ginzburg | first1=David | last2=Jiang | first2=Dihua | last3=Rallis | first3=Stephen | title=On the nonvanishing of the central value of the Rankin–Selberg L-functions, II. | year=2005 | journal=Automorphic Representations, L-functions and Applications: Progress and Prospects | publisher=Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ. 11, de Gruyter | place=Berlin | pages=157–191}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Ginzburg | first1=David | last2=Jiang | first2=Dihua | last3=Rallis | first3=Stephen | title=Models for certain residual representations of unitary groups. Automorphic forms and L-functions I. | year=2009 | journal=Global aspects | publisher=Contemp. Math., 488, Amer. Math. Soc. | place=Providence, RI | pages=125–146}}</ref> |
||
In the Bessel case of the global |
In the Bessel case of the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture, [[Wei Zhang (mathematician) | Wei Zhang]] used the theory of the [[Arthur–Selberg trace formula|relative trace formula]] by [[Hervé Jacquet]] and the work on the fundamental lemma by [[Zhiwei Yun]] to prove that the conjecture is true subject to certain local conditions in 2014.<ref>{{Citation | last=Zhang | first=Wei | title=Fourier transform and the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for unitary groups. | year=2014 | journal=Annals of Mathematics | mr=2874638 | volume=180 | issue=3 | pages=971–1049}}</ref> |
||
In the |
In the Fourier–Jacobi case of the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture, Yifeng Liu and Hang Xue showed that the conjecture holds in the skew-Hermitian case subject to certain local conditions.<ref>{{Citation | last=Liu | first=Yifeng | title=Relative trace formulae toward Bessel and Fourier–Jacobi periods of unitary groups. | year=2014 | journal=Manuscripta Mathematica | volume=145 | issue=1-2 | pages=1–69}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last=Xue | first=Hang| title=The Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for U(n) × U(n). | year=2014 | journal=[[Advances in Mathematics]] | volume=262 | pages=1130–1191 | doi=10.1016/j.aim.2014.06.010 | mr=3228451}}</ref> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
Revision as of 17:00, 29 October 2018
In mathematics, the Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture is a restriction problem in the representation theory of real or p-adic Lie groups posed by Wee Teck Gan, Benedict Gross, and Dipendra Prasad.[1] The problem originated from a conjecture of Gross and Prasad for special orthogonal groups but was later generalized to include all four classical groups. In the cases considered, it is known that the multiplicity of the restrictions is at most one and the conjecture describes when the multiplicity is precisely one.[2][3][4]
Motivation
A motivating example is the following classical branching problem in the theory of compact Lie groups. Let be an irreducible finite dimensional representation of the compact unitary group , and consider its restriction to the naturally embedded subgroup . It is known that this restriction is multiplicity-free, but one may ask precisely which irreducible representations of occur in the restriction.
By the Cartan–Weyl theory of highest weights, there is a classification of the irreducible representations of via their highest weights which are in natural bijection with sequences of integers . Now suppose that has highest weight . Then an irreducible representation of with highest weight occurs in the restriction of to (viewed as a subgroup of ) if and only if and are interlacing, i.e. .[5]
The Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture then considers the analogous restriction problem for other classical groups.[6]
Statement
The conjecture has slightly different forms for the different classical groups. The formulation for general unitary groups is as follows.
Setup
Let be a finite-dimensional vector space over a field not of characteristic equipped with a non-degenerate sesquilinear form that is -symmetric (i.e. if the form is symmetric and if the form is skew-symmetric. Let be a non-degenerate subspace of such that of dimension . Then let , where is the unitary group preserving the form on , and let be the diagonal subgroup of .
Let be an irreducible smooth representation of and let be either the trivial representation (the "Bessel case") or the Weil representation (the "Fourier–Jacobi case"). Let be a generic L-parameter for , and let be the associated Vogan L-packet.
Local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture
If is a local L-parameter for , then
- .
Letting be the "distinguished character" defined in terms of the Langlands–Deligne local constant, then furthermore
- if and only if .
Global Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture
For a quadratic field extension , let where is the global L-function obtained as the product of local L-factors given by the local Langlands conjectures. The following are equivalent:
- The period interval is nonzero when restricted to .
- For all places , the local Hom space and .
Current status
Local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture
In a series of four papers between 2010 and 2012, Jean-Loup Waldspurger proved the local Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for tempered representations of orthogonal groups over p-adic fields.[7][8][9][10] In 2012, Colette Moeglin and Waldspurger then proved the local Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for generic non-tempered representations of orthogonal groups over p-adic fields.[11]
In his 2013 thesis, Raphaël Beuzart-Plessis proved the local Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for the tempered representations of unitary groups in the p-adic Hermitian case under the same hypotheses needed to establish the local Langlands conjecture.[12]
Global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture
In a series of papers between 2004 and 2009, David Ginzburg, Dihua Jiang, and Stephen Rallis showed the (1) implies (2) direction of the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture.[13][14][15]
In the Bessel case of the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture, Wei Zhang used the theory of the relative trace formula by Hervé Jacquet and the work on the fundamental lemma by Zhiwei Yun to prove that the conjecture is true subject to certain local conditions in 2014.[16]
In the Fourier–Jacobi case of the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture, Yifeng Liu and Hang Xue showed that the conjecture holds in the skew-Hermitian case subject to certain local conditions.[17][18]
References
- ^ Gan, Wee Teck; Gross, Benedict H.; Prasad, Dipendra (2012), "Symplectic local root numbers, central critical L-values, and restriction problems in the representation theory of classical groups", Astérisque, 346: 1–109, ISBN 978-2-85629-348-5, MR 3202556
- ^ Aizenbud, Avraham; Gourevitch, Dmitry; Rallis, Stephen; Schiffmann, Gérard (2010), "Multiplicity-one theorems", Annals of Mathematics, 172 (2): 1407–1434, MR 2680495
- ^ Sun, Binyong (2012), "Multiplicity-one theorems for Fourier–Jacobi models", American Journal of Mathematics, 134 (6): 1655–1678, doi:10.1353/ajm.2012.0044
- ^ Sun, Binyong (2012), "Multiplicity-one theorems: the Archimedean case", Annals of Mathematics, 175 (1): 23–44, MR 2874638
- ^ Weyl, Hermann (1946), The classical groups, Princeton University Press
- ^ Gan, Wee Teck (2014), "Recent progress on the Gross-Prasad conjecture", Acta Mathematica Vietnamica, 39 (1): 11–33, doi:10.1007/s40306-014-0047-2, ISSN 2315-4144
- ^ Waldspurger, Jean-Loup (2012), "Une Formule intégrale reliée à la conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad.", Compositio Mathematica, 146: 1180–1290
- ^ Waldspurger, Jean-Loup (2012), "Une Formule intégrale reliée à la conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad, 2ème partie: extension aux représentations tempérées.", Astérisque, 347: 171–311
- ^ Waldspurger, Jean-Loup (2012), "La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les représentations tempérées des groupes spéciaux orthogonaux.", Astérisque, 347: 103–166
- ^ Waldspurger, Jean-Loup (2012), "Calcul d'une valeur d'un facteur epsilon par une formule intégrale.", Astérisque, 347
- ^ Moeglin, Colette; Waldspurger, Jean-Loup (2012), "La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les groupes spéciaux orthogonaux: le cas général", Astérisque, 347
- ^ Beuzart-Plessis, Raphaël (2012), "La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les représentations tempérées des groupes unitaires", PhD thesis
- ^ Ginzburg, David; Jiang, Dihua; Rallis, Stephen (2004), "On the nonvanishing of the central value of the Rankin–Selberg L-functions.", Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 17 (3): 679–722
- ^ Ginzburg, David; Jiang, Dihua; Rallis, Stephen (2005), "On the nonvanishing of the central value of the Rankin–Selberg L-functions, II.", Automorphic Representations, L-functions and Applications: Progress and Prospects, Berlin: Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ. 11, de Gruyter: 157–191
- ^ Ginzburg, David; Jiang, Dihua; Rallis, Stephen (2009), "Models for certain residual representations of unitary groups. Automorphic forms and L-functions I.", Global aspects, Providence, RI: Contemp. Math., 488, Amer. Math. Soc.: 125–146
- ^ Zhang, Wei (2014), "Fourier transform and the global Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for unitary groups.", Annals of Mathematics, 180 (3): 971–1049, MR 2874638
- ^ Liu, Yifeng (2014), "Relative trace formulae toward Bessel and Fourier–Jacobi periods of unitary groups.", Manuscripta Mathematica, 145 (1–2): 1–69
- ^ Xue, Hang (2014), "The Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for U(n) × U(n).", Advances in Mathematics, 262: 1130–1191, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2014.06.010, MR 3228451