Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsie Ivancich Dunin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:04, 15 November 2006

Non-notable (if only every college professor was notable to be on Wikipedia), see Wikipedia:Spam. Youngster of Germany 02:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to mention Elonka seems to have many vanity articles concerning herself and her family... nothing personal.
Delete per nom. Little to no real content anyways, since Jimbo Wales himself had to go and remove most of it as original research. I believe other articles concerning this family have been apart of a heated discussion in the past, so lets just keep this AfD about this article. -- Ned Scott 04:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Before anyone else points it out, Youngster of Germany does appear to be a "Single purpose account", who's first three edits are those that are required for an AfD. I'm sure someone will say he's a sock puppet or a troll. However, I feel the nomination rational is valid, regardless of the motive it or who nominated it. So, assume good faith, and all that jazz. -- Ned Scott 04:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure I am no sock puppet. I have about 75 edits as an IP address. In truth, I did make an account to create some AfDs. Vanity article really grind my gears. Youngster of Germany 00:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 14:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NN academic, and the article seems to be copyvio from here. Sam Clark 15:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — This version shows plenty of notability - Just look at all those references! Matthew Fenton (talk · contribs · count · email) 17:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Note that the information mentioned above by MatthewFenton was removed by Jimbo Wales. Ehheh 17:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The long-standing "professor test" would seem to apply here — I didn't know that there were professors in "dance ethnology", but if she is one (and at UCLA, a major university), she's presumably notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Keep''' — [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elsie_Ivancich_Dunin&oldid=78680562 This version] shows plenty of notability - Just look at all those references! <small>[[User:MatthewFenton|Matthew Fenton]]&nbsp;([[User talk:MatthewFenton|talk]]{{·}} [[Special:Contributions/MatthewFenton|contribs]]{{·}} <span class="plainlinks" style="color:#002bb8">[http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username={{urlencode:MatthewFenton}}&site=en.wikipedia.org count]</span>{{·}} [[Special:Emailuser/MatthewFenton|email]])</small> 17:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. Note that the information mentioned above by MatthewFenton was removed by Jimbo Wales. [[User:Ehheh|Ehheh]] 17:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Weak keep'''.  The long-standing "professor test" would seem to apply here — I didn't know that there were professors in "dance ethnology", but if she is one (and at UCLA, a major university), she's presumably notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <small>([[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josiah Rowe|contribs]])</small> 18:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)