User talk:Coolmarc: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Coolmarc/Archive 1) (bot |
→"Mad Love": new section |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
IIRC, either you or another user started a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Record charts]] on the Latvian chart, the one located at the website pieci.lv and published by the national broadcaster [[Latvijas Radio 5]], but there was no consensus. I don't go around adding the chart, but I don't agree with its removal from [[Havana (Camila Cabello song)]] or any article until there is consensus. I don't know if you were confused about it being the Latvian chart mentioned at [[WP:BADCHARTS]], but that was a different Latvian chart entirely, one called "Latvijas rokziņu aģentūra" (there are logs proving this), so please don't remove it in future until there is consensus that it is a single-network chart and/or is listed at [[WP:BADCHARTS]]. It is '''just''' as notable as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mad_Love_(Mabel_song)&diff=prev&oldid=905634618 this Croatian chart] you added to [[Mad Love (Mabel song)]], which by the same logic could be considered just as much of a single-network chart as it is ''also'' a radio chart published by a national broadcaster. Thanks. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 14:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC) |
IIRC, either you or another user started a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Record charts]] on the Latvian chart, the one located at the website pieci.lv and published by the national broadcaster [[Latvijas Radio 5]], but there was no consensus. I don't go around adding the chart, but I don't agree with its removal from [[Havana (Camila Cabello song)]] or any article until there is consensus. I don't know if you were confused about it being the Latvian chart mentioned at [[WP:BADCHARTS]], but that was a different Latvian chart entirely, one called "Latvijas rokziņu aģentūra" (there are logs proving this), so please don't remove it in future until there is consensus that it is a single-network chart and/or is listed at [[WP:BADCHARTS]]. It is '''just''' as notable as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mad_Love_(Mabel_song)&diff=prev&oldid=905634618 this Croatian chart] you added to [[Mad Love (Mabel song)]], which by the same logic could be considered just as much of a single-network chart as it is ''also'' a radio chart published by a national broadcaster. Thanks. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 14:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
== "Mad Love" == |
|||
Stop removing content from the Reception section without any valid arguments. Nowhere does it say that the ''DIY'' review is a press release. Actually, the whole makeover you gave to the Reception section was completely unnecessary. You made it harder to read. Please calm down, thanks.—''[[User:MaranoFan|<b style="color:purple">N</b>]][[User talk:MaranoFan|<b style="color:teal">Ø</b>]]'' 04:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:56, 3 August 2019
| Please leave a . |
- Please remember to sign your signature using the
button or placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
There has been no consensus to determine the Latvian chart a bad chart
IIRC, either you or another user started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Record charts on the Latvian chart, the one located at the website pieci.lv and published by the national broadcaster Latvijas Radio 5, but there was no consensus. I don't go around adding the chart, but I don't agree with its removal from Havana (Camila Cabello song) or any article until there is consensus. I don't know if you were confused about it being the Latvian chart mentioned at WP:BADCHARTS, but that was a different Latvian chart entirely, one called "Latvijas rokziņu aģentūra" (there are logs proving this), so please don't remove it in future until there is consensus that it is a single-network chart and/or is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. It is just as notable as this Croatian chart you added to Mad Love (Mabel song), which by the same logic could be considered just as much of a single-network chart as it is also a radio chart published by a national broadcaster. Thanks. Ss112 14:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
"Mad Love"
Stop removing content from the Reception section without any valid arguments. Nowhere does it say that the DIY review is a press release. Actually, the whole makeover you gave to the Reception section was completely unnecessary. You made it harder to read. Please calm down, thanks.—NØ 04:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)