User talk:Funplussmart: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:11, 17 November 2019

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Funplussmart.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If the matter is urgent consider contact via email

Archives

1, 2

Orphaned non-free image File:South Station logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South Station logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit

Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse

In focus: The BBC looks at Chinese government editing

Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars

Community view: Observations from the mainland

Arbitration report: October actions

Traffic report: Wrestling with a couple of teenagers, a Nobelist, and a lot of jokers

Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast

Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia

Essay: Wikipedia is in the real world

News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around

On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
-== Heritability ==
-I'm having a problem with the IQ heritability wikipedia page that I wish you would help with.
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
-This guy has been trolling this page for several months.  213.233.150.88.  I understand I have given him his first warning and once he gets to four warnings he can be banned.
-He keeps citing a 200 dollar textbook for the definition of heritability that is not on the wikipedia page for heritabillity.  He cites Alice Marcus and you can see that citation isn't on this page for heritability.
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability
-So he is using this citation to edit the conclusions of the actual IQ heritabilities.  Its a citation that no one can see, and his edits go completely against the way that the authors of the other citations on the IQ heritability page state their work and against the definitions of heritability from the wikipedia page.
-He will state something like "IQ is x for those samples in those examined studies"  It is literally a violation of population statistics.  Population statistics are not valid for just the sample, it is valid for the population studied.  He is literally lying there.
-Hes reverted another change of another user as well several times, he keeps saying heritability is an upper bound and you can see on the wikipedia page for heritability that it isn't an upper bound it is simply an estimate.  More lies.
-His citation that he clings to is above the portions he is editing by several sentences.  He posts the Alice Marcus (3) citation and several sentences later he is editing the conclusions of the actual studies on IQ heritability for vague reasons from a source that no one can see.
-Citations 7-9 on the IQ heritability page literally state the the heritability of IQ is X.  He is deviating from the scientists conclusions for political reasons.
-:I would recommend getting administrator attention at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] if this has been a long-term problem with a single user. I don't know very much about this issue so I can't help you. But please be calm next time. [[User:Funplussmart|funplussmart]] ([[User talk:Funplussmart#top|talk]]) 21:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
-I don't think ALLCAPS will help me very much  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.229.210.51|68.229.210.51]] ([[User talk:68.229.210.51#top|talk]]) 22:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 ==Orphaned non-free image File:South Station logo.PNG==
 [[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:South Station logo.PNG]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).