Jump to content

User talk:Funplussmart/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

You may also want to see User:Funplussmart/Awards for Barnstars and the like.

Returning

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Funplussmart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It was a long but needed break from the site, but I now want to return and continue contributing. Don't expect me to be as active as I was in the past though.

Accept reason:

Accepting since this is a user request block. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Heritability

I'm having a problem with the IQ heritability wikipedia page that I wish you would help with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

This guy has been trolling this page for several months. 213.233.150.88. I understand I have given him his first warning and once he gets to four warnings he can be banned.

He keeps citing a 200 dollar textbook for the definition of heritability that is not on the wikipedia page for heritabillity. He cites Alice Marcus and you can see that citation isn't on this page for heritability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability

So he is using this citation to edit the conclusions of the actual IQ heritabilities. Its a citation that no one can see, and his edits go completely against the way that the authors of the other citations on the IQ heritability page state their work and against the definitions of heritability from the wikipedia page.

He will state something like "IQ is x for those samples in those examined studies" It is literally a violation of population statistics. Population statistics are not valid for just the sample, it is valid for the population studied. He is literally lying there.

Hes reverted another change of another user as well several times, he keeps saying heritability is an upper bound and you can see on the wikipedia page for heritability that it isn't an upper bound it is simply an estimate. More lies.

His citation that he clings to is above the portions he is editing by several sentences. He posts the Alice Marcus (3) citation and several sentences later he is editing the conclusions of the actual studies on IQ heritability for vague reasons from a source that no one can see.

Citations 7-9 on the IQ heritability page literally state the the heritability of IQ is X. He is deviating from the scientists conclusions for political reasons.

I would recommend getting administrator attention at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents if this has been a long-term problem with a single user. I don't know very much about this issue so I can't help you. But please be calm next time. funplussmart (talk) 21:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)


I don't think ALLCAPS will help me very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.210.51 (talk) 22:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:South Station logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South Station logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

About our new account

New User
Im sorry I missunderstood how to use this. What can I post or write on here and how do I do it. Just write something like a Biography?
Dileot (talk) 03:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
@Dileot:. I replaced the text on your talk page with a welcome message with relevant information. You're fine, everyone makes mistakes. Feel free to message me if you have further questions. funplussmart (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

we're beating a dead horse

funplussmart we're beating a dead horse on Seneca Valley. I've requested page protection and reported the vandals. I also pinged an admin to see if I get them to act quick. let's stop reverting them cuz otherwise we'll just make them want to keep it up. Once some admin's can act it should calm. ToeFungii (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@ToeFungii: Thank you for your reporting the situation. However, the integrity of the affected page needs to be maintained as much as possible. This is not to say that vandals and trolls being motivated by edit warring with users isn't a problem. You may wish to see WP:RBI and WP:DENY for what to do in those situations. funplussmart (talk) 21:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I was going for the IBRL (ignore but revert later). Fortunately i was able to find that thing to id an active admin and was able to get them to protect the page. hopefully that will stop the foolishness. Glad to have worked with you. I thought they had me on the ropes until you stepped in. ToeFungii (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Orphaned non-free image File:South Station logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South Station logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

Hello! I am not sure if you know this, but in cases where one user has created two or more junk articles (e.g. QueenNoble), you can just make one AfD and then mention both articles in it. It is described at WP:BUNDLE. --- Possibly 03:28, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions


Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page


Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Union Station Kansas City logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Union Station Kansas City logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 04:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)