User talk:Apollo1203: Difference between revisions
LeadSongDog (talk | contribs) →Revert: itemized |
Apollo1203 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
8. I downcased another ref title. |
8. I downcased another ref title. |
||
Which of these do you consider not to be an improvement in the copy? [[User:LeadSongDog|LeadSongDog]] <small>[[User talk:LeadSongDog#top|<span style="color: red; font-family:Papyrus;">come howl!</span>]]</small> 20:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC) |
Which of these do you consider not to be an improvement in the copy? [[User:LeadSongDog|LeadSongDog]] <small>[[User talk:LeadSongDog#top|<span style="color: red; font-family:Papyrus;">come howl!</span>]]</small> 20:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
<br> |
|||
:Thank you for the clarification. I've reviewed the edits further: |
|||
::1. I edited the references as you had in my edits |
|||
::2. He is introduced as Pramukh Swami Maharaj throughout, so keeping 'Pramukh Swami Maharaj received...' is fine regarding initiation |
|||
::3. Yogiji Maharaj became guru in 1951 when Shastriji Maharaj passed away. Yogiji Maharaj is credited as declaring Pramukh Swami Maharaj as his successor upon his passing in 1971. |
|||
::4. I replaced the use of Pramukh Swami Maharaj with 'he' in the instance of 'As president of BAPS...' |
|||
[[User:Apollo1203|Apollo1203]] ([[User talk:Apollo1203#top|talk]]) 20:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:52, 10 December 2019
This is Apollo1203's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Revert
You reverted me saying "unsourced edits". What part of that edit did you think was a change of substance that needed new refs? I thought it was just copyediting. LeadSongDog come howl! 18:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Correct it wasn't a substance change, however, I don't think it helped improve the article therefore I reverted your edits. I believe there wasn't anything incorrect with the grammar or English the way it was written. Apollo1203 (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- In future, please try not to use misleading edit comments. It undermines good faith editing. Now, item by item:
- Correct it wasn't a substance change, however, I don't think it helped improve the article therefore I reverted your edits. I believe there wasn't anything incorrect with the grammar or English the way it was written. Apollo1203 (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
1. I downcased a ref title from "A New Face of Hinduism: The Swaminarayan Religion" to "A new face of Hinduism: The Swaminarayan religion" as is the normal practice. I trust that was not objectionable.
2. I corrected an anachronism from "Pramukh Swami Maharaj" to "Patel", as he had not yet taken that name.
3. I removed the recent addition of the ambiguous "Yogiji Maharaj" used to indicate Shastriji Maharaj.
4. I corrected the redundant use of "Pramukh Swami Maharaj" for the second time in a single para.
5. I used more succinct phrasing, avoiding repetition of the article title, and corrected tense.
6. I corrected the misattribution of effort by BAPS as a whole to its leader.
7. I used more succinct phrasing, avoiding repetition of the article title.
8. I downcased another ref title.
Which of these do you consider not to be an improvement in the copy? LeadSongDog come howl! 20:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. I've reviewed the edits further:
- 1. I edited the references as you had in my edits
- 2. He is introduced as Pramukh Swami Maharaj throughout, so keeping 'Pramukh Swami Maharaj received...' is fine regarding initiation
- 3. Yogiji Maharaj became guru in 1951 when Shastriji Maharaj passed away. Yogiji Maharaj is credited as declaring Pramukh Swami Maharaj as his successor upon his passing in 1971.
- 4. I replaced the use of Pramukh Swami Maharaj with 'he' in the instance of 'As president of BAPS...'