User talk:Steel1943: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→A bear hug for you!: response |
|||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
*{{Ping|Dmehus}} I appreciate that, and I hope that you don't take anything that I'm telling you the wrong way. I've just been dealing with such subjects for almost a decade now, and I see the patterns that need to occur to make both the community happy and to make Wikipedia a place that can be used as it's intended to be used. (But, of course, that doesn't mean that I'm always right, and I know I'm not; I could clearly be with consensus sometimes, all the time, or almost none of the time. We all just kind of learn as we go.) [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #2F4F4F;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 00:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC) |
*{{Ping|Dmehus}} I appreciate that, and I hope that you don't take anything that I'm telling you the wrong way. I've just been dealing with such subjects for almost a decade now, and I see the patterns that need to occur to make both the community happy and to make Wikipedia a place that can be used as it's intended to be used. (But, of course, that doesn't mean that I'm always right, and I know I'm not; I could clearly be with consensus sometimes, all the time, or almost none of the time. We all just kind of learn as we go.) [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #2F4F4F;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 00:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
::{{u|Steel1943}}, Hi, I've responded to your comment, but with my clarification, I'm wondering if you might be able to remove, climb down from, or otherwise refactor your reply in which you wrote, "...@Dmehus: So, I never once cited or linked WP:RS, so please don't claim that I did; obviously, a third party search engine search is sufficient. And I don't know where in the heck you saw me disagree that "...commonly used redirects targeted to the proper article with the correct information can be very useful." With that being said, I'm going be very blunt with this next statement: Please stop claiming that I said either the opposite of what I said or that I said something I did not because I'm getting to a point where I'm considering requesting a two-way interaction ban between us. Thank you. (...)"? See my updated replies. [[User:Dmehus|'''Doug Mehus''']]''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;"> [[User talk:Dmehus|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/Dmehus|C]]</span>'' 21:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
::{{u|Steel1943}}, Hi, I've responded to your comment, but with my clarification, I'm wondering if you might be able to remove, climb down from, or otherwise refactor your reply in which you wrote, "...@Dmehus: So, I never once cited or linked WP:RS, so please don't claim that I did; obviously, a third party search engine search is sufficient. And I don't know where in the heck you saw me disagree that "...commonly used redirects targeted to the proper article with the correct information can be very useful." With that being said, I'm going be very blunt with this next statement: Please stop claiming that I said either the opposite of what I said or that I said something I did not because I'm getting to a point where I'm considering requesting a two-way interaction ban between us. Thank you. (...)"? See my updated replies. [[User:Dmehus|'''Doug Mehus''']]''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;"> [[User talk:Dmehus|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/Dmehus|C]]</span>'' 21:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::{{Ping|Dmehus}} At [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 31#Gavaccino]], you said: "{{Tq|There were some interesting points between {{u|Steel1943}} and I above, but in the grand scheme of the discussion, I don't think it's essential to this redirect's discussion, particularly I've since changed my !vote.}}" Oh wow, what a self-centered statement that comes off as a borderline [[WP:OWN]] issue. Wikipedia is a ''community project'', not the ''Dmehus project''. I could honestly care less that my statement had ''any bearing'' on your vote; discussions are assessed by closers who implement the consensus and arguments presented by ''all'' participants in the discussion. And to invalidate my comments in this regard as inapplicable to figuring out the fate of {{No redirect|Gavaccino}} ... considering that I did my best to stay on-topic until you decided to completely disregard the contents of my statements and then change yours to make it seem like I didn't respond to yours appropriately and, whether intentionally or unintentionally <small>(I really don't care to find out which)</small> have made me sound like an idiot with the way I responded to the comment you changed inappropriately, I have ''no desire'' to withdraw my statements and ''no desire'' to change anything else that I have stated in that discussion thus far. In fact, at this point, I ''highly'' recommend that you do your best to not interact with me anymore as your continuous lack of comprehending discussions, rather-misguided and unclear responses, and now apparently attempts to cover up your tracks to make editors sound like idiots makes me realize that it is not in the least productive to interact with you. Please do not mention me, please do not thank me, and please do not directly respond to my edits ever again, as I plan on doing the same. (I understand that unless there is consensus for it, I cannot stop you in participating in discussions that I start or participate in and vice versa, but please do not reference me directly in any of such discussions ever again.) Thank you, please respect this, and have a nice life. [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #2F4F4F;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 17:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:10, 2 February 2020
My worklist...
|
|---|
|
User:Steel1943/RfA criteria (and I don't even use it anymore)
|
CAN'T RETIRE
Steel1943 tried to leave Wikipedia, but found that they couldn't do so…
Happy New Year!
.jpg)
-
MMXX Lunar Calendar
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.
– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year
– Utopes (talk) 04:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Ref desk talk
The item in question is from a year ago November.[1] Obviously long past usefulness. Thanks for zapping it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
A bear hug for you!
.jpg)
|
WikiBearHug |
| We have had, recently, a fair number of in-depth, passionate, but civil, disagreements at RfD and I feel like I should give you a WikiBearHug because I want you to know that, though we disagree, I appreciate your contributions to RfD, your patrolling, and, where applicable, your assistance. Doug Mehus T·C 00:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC) |
- @Dmehus: I appreciate that, and I hope that you don't take anything that I'm telling you the wrong way. I've just been dealing with such subjects for almost a decade now, and I see the patterns that need to occur to make both the community happy and to make Wikipedia a place that can be used as it's intended to be used. (But, of course, that doesn't mean that I'm always right, and I know I'm not; I could clearly be with consensus sometimes, all the time, or almost none of the time. We all just kind of learn as we go.) Steel1943 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Steel1943, Hi, I've responded to your comment, but with my clarification, I'm wondering if you might be able to remove, climb down from, or otherwise refactor your reply in which you wrote, "...@Dmehus: So, I never once cited or linked WP:RS, so please don't claim that I did; obviously, a third party search engine search is sufficient. And I don't know where in the heck you saw me disagree that "...commonly used redirects targeted to the proper article with the correct information can be very useful." With that being said, I'm going be very blunt with this next statement: Please stop claiming that I said either the opposite of what I said or that I said something I did not because I'm getting to a point where I'm considering requesting a two-way interaction ban between us. Thank you. (...)"? See my updated replies. Doug Mehus T·C 21:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: At Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 31#Gavaccino, you said: "
There were some interesting points between Steel1943 and I above, but in the grand scheme of the discussion, I don't think it's essential to this redirect's discussion, particularly I've since changed my !vote.
" Oh wow, what a self-centered statement that comes off as a borderline WP:OWN issue. Wikipedia is a community project, not the Dmehus project. I could honestly care less that my statement had any bearing on your vote; discussions are assessed by closers who implement the consensus and arguments presented by all participants in the discussion. And to invalidate my comments in this regard as inapplicable to figuring out the fate of Gavaccino ... considering that I did my best to stay on-topic until you decided to completely disregard the contents of my statements and then change yours to make it seem like I didn't respond to yours appropriately and, whether intentionally or unintentionally (I really don't care to find out which) have made me sound like an idiot with the way I responded to the comment you changed inappropriately, I have no desire to withdraw my statements and no desire to change anything else that I have stated in that discussion thus far. In fact, at this point, I highly recommend that you do your best to not interact with me anymore as your continuous lack of comprehending discussions, rather-misguided and unclear responses, and now apparently attempts to cover up your tracks to make editors sound like idiots makes me realize that it is not in the least productive to interact with you. Please do not mention me, please do not thank me, and please do not directly respond to my edits ever again, as I plan on doing the same. (I understand that unless there is consensus for it, I cannot stop you in participating in discussions that I start or participate in and vice versa, but please do not reference me directly in any of such discussions ever again.) Thank you, please respect this, and have a nice life. Steel1943 (talk) 17:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: At Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 31#Gavaccino, you said: "
- Steel1943, Hi, I've responded to your comment, but with my clarification, I'm wondering if you might be able to remove, climb down from, or otherwise refactor your reply in which you wrote, "...@Dmehus: So, I never once cited or linked WP:RS, so please don't claim that I did; obviously, a third party search engine search is sufficient. And I don't know where in the heck you saw me disagree that "...commonly used redirects targeted to the proper article with the correct information can be very useful." With that being said, I'm going be very blunt with this next statement: Please stop claiming that I said either the opposite of what I said or that I said something I did not because I'm getting to a point where I'm considering requesting a two-way interaction ban between us. Thank you. (...)"? See my updated replies. Doug Mehus T·C 21:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)