Talk:Ruined orgasm: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
merged |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth]]. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. [[User:Mdwh|Mdwh]] 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
:[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth]]. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. [[User:Mdwh|Mdwh]] 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Merged== |
|||
Merged into [[Erotic sexual denial]] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. [[user:FT2|FT2]] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:04, 21 December 2006
"Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."
pfffft
This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like
http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincspoacher (talk • contribs)
- The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Mdwh 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Merged
Merged into Erotic sexual denial -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. FT2 (Talk | email) 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)