User talk:Luna Santin

Talk – Sandbox – Blog

Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here. When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps: • Use a ==descriptive heading== • Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages • Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions. Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.

Happy Hanukkah

Happy Hanukkah

Happy Hanukkah Luna Santin I know you're not Jewish but I am so I feal like spreading the Hanukkah feeling. Thanks for getting me unblocked.Sam ov the blue sand 23:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Price is Right redirects

Why did you delete two Price is Right redirects? The admin closing the RfD concerning those two closed it as a "keep". Philwelch 23:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Untitled section

So what am i supposed to do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SmokeyPirate (talk • contribs) 16 December 2006.

Thanks.

Hey, thanks for reverting the removals from my talk page archive. Looks like one of the parties didn't want a record of the dispute around. --Maxamegalon2000 16:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

AOL Netblocks

As requested here are the AOL netblocks: 62.51.0.0/16 64.236.0.0/16 66.185.128.0/19 149.174.0.0/16 152.163.0.0/16 172.128.0.0/10 172.192.0.0/12 172.208.0.0/14 172.212.0.0/16 172.213.0.0/16 172.214.0.0/16 172.215.0.0/16 172.216.0.0/16 195.93.0.0/17 198.81.0.0/19 204.29.186.0/23 204.140.8.0/22 204.235.112.0/24 204.235.113.0/24 204.235.114.0/24 204.235.116.0/24 204.235.117.0/24 204.235.119.0/24 204.235.120.0/24 204.235.121.0/24 205.188.0.0/16 206.222.224.0/19 207.200.96.0/22 207.200.112.0/20 207.200.112.0/20 217.137.0.0/17 217.137.132.0/22 217.137.136.0/21 211.137.144.0/20 211.137.160.0/19 211.137.196.0/22 211.137.200.0/21 211.137.208.0/20 211.137.224.0/20 211.137.224.0/20 211.137.240.0/21 211.137.248.0/22 211.137.252.0/24 211.137.253.0/24 211.137.254.0/24

Good Luck, Somitho 23:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

unblock-en-l

Please email Essjay using the Special:Emailuser to discuss moderation of this mailing list. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 01:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Uncivil behaviour

Hi! Sorry, to bother you. Could you have a quick look at my talk page and Talk:Wigan. Some of the comments have been fairly un civil at the least, but I would be interested to know if you think if they are personal attacks. Certainly I've got myself dragged into an edit war that is proving very boring. Thanks in advance for any advice. Regan123 04:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

— Deon555^talk_desk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for that speedy =) — Deon555^talk_desk 08:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted page?

Greetings, you recently posted a message on my talk page about a article I created was deleted, I know of no such thing since the last time a created one was 3 weeks ago. Thanks Sloveniaiscool 16:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Third opinion

Do not remove entries from WP:3O without cause. Entries do not have to fit your definition of "neutral." I have it on my watchlist, so do not try again. KazakhPol 19:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Funny, I see nothing there to justify your removing a valid entry. KazakhPol 19:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I have moved your comment on Pco's talkpage to a new section, as I believe we are discussing separate topics at the moment. Your comment is under the section "untitled." On a separate note, there is an ongoing conversation on Wikipedia talk:Third opinion you may be interested in, KazakhPol 20:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, whats up with removing my request? You must be a friend of Jayjg. Pco 20:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Luna's actions in this matter. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 22:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Lin

You know what I'll keep in mind? You need to fuck off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rasburried (talk • contribs) 17 December 2006.

where did "cold fusion/tmp" go ?

You seem to have deleted cold fusion/tmp on Sept 18, 2006. This temporary page was written by a cold fusion researcher, and, as such, contained valuable information. I wanted to have a second look at it to improve the cold fusion article. Why was it deleted ? Was the deletion discussed and approved somewhere ? Is there anyway to find it again ? It would be sad if we could not find it anymore. Pcarbonn 22:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for undeleting it. Where exactly did you put it ? I can't find it. Pcarbonn 17:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeagley article

Hi, you've been following the recent controversy at David A. Yeagley? Multiple IPs (most likely sockpuppets) keep deleting the entire article, replacing it with a strongly negative/POV "hatchet job" article. I realize that this individual is political and thus leaves his writings open to scrutiny and commentary, but the continued reversion without collaboration or use of the discussion page (it's been several weeks) is a bit difficult to deal with. Nobody has responded to the posting I made to the biographies noticeboard so I wonder how I should proceed, other than keep reverting the article for an indefinite duration into the future. I suppose the IPs could be considered to be committing repeated vandalism, but your input would be appreciated. Badagnani 04:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks. Badagnani 09:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 51	18 December 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: Holiday publication
Elections conclude, arbitrators to be chosen	Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser opens
WikiWorld comic: "Dr. Seuss"	News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

You have new blinkennbox.

Does it work? [ælfəks] 06:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Is this User blocked?

I am not sure. Can you please check up on it and put a template which notes the blockage? Thanks. Bearly541 10:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I forgot about the log. I don't have access to it, since I am not an administrator. Bearly541 10:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

1-5-7-1

Were you going to put this on AfD? I've created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-5-7-1 and added my arguments for deletion there. I like a lot of the telephony articles on Wikipedia; they were one of the reasons I came here. However I don't think we need an article on what appears to be little more than a voicemail service. Graham87 11:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Can We Block This User?

This User: 210.5.121.190. You removed vandalism from the Prussian Blue (duo) Talk Page that that User left before. The User left this vile, threatening vandalism before; and I believe they should be blocked for it. By the content of the vandalism, I consider this User to be dangerous. Acalamari 16:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for blocking them. Most vandalism is annoying, but the type of vandalism that the User far, far beyond "normal" vandalism. I gave this User a warning when they first left the threat, but it seems that the User wrote the threat again. We'll see if the vandal keeps doing it after the block. Again, thanks. Acalamari 21:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Church of Google

I would like to inquire about recent deletion of "Church Of Google" article. The reason given was quite criptic, and I`d like an explanation, please. Alice Shade 22:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Church Of Google

Article was placed in Wikipedia according to "Search engine criteria". At the current time, requesting search for "church google" or "church of google" will yield several top-rank search results, which are either highly relevant, either directly connected with subject at hand. (tested at www.google.com and www.yahoo.com)

It was designed primarily not as a reference to particular organisation, but as a summary of religion/philosophy, geared to provide relevant information and refute several common misconceptions. Subject was referenced several times, both by internet resources and press - it could be seen in the search results, which back up earlier claim.

As an example of relevant press - http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/29/nyt.friedman/

This article was printed in New York Times, and references to subject as religion/philosophy.

As a side note, article represented a work in progress, and the state it was deleted in, could be described as stub - expansion of it was planned to follow through, along with wikification and compilation of references. It is a joint project, thus it`s compilation was stretched to accomodate contributors from different time zones. Alice Shade

Sneaky vandalism

Dhxaluzabm77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just showed up on recent changes, same MO as the others you blocked. Choess 03:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll hang on RC for a while yet, drop any others I see onto AIV for someone else to handle. Choess 03:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Re:Church Of Google

Well, if it comes to that...

http://www.pandia.com/sw-2004/16-god.html

http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20040504GoogleFindsReligion.html

Those articles date back to 2004 (another two of top searches for "church of google"), and reference solely to idea of religion/philosophy. They have no connection whatsoever with www.thechurchofgoogle.org - which was founded at summer of 2006. Moreso, those articles reference an Orkut society, which is quite a different medium, then web site.

I think, that this provides enough of proof to state, that the idea of such religion/philosophy is not a singular joke occurance, and had been voiced and researched in several different cases and sociums, which, in my opinion, would be reason enough to provide an outline in Wikipedia.

Alice Shade 11:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Luna!

Oops, indeed! That'll teach me for making sneaky edits while at work. Thanks for letting me know. :) Sarah Ewart 12:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Church_of_Google on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Church_of_Google. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Alice Shade 16:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for unblocking me, it made my day! I'm thankful there are people on the Wikipedia that are willing to be reasonable. Happy Holidays too. Tblore 18:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

How is an Admin De-Syopsed?

Luna, what is the process of an admin being de-syopsed? Don't worry, I am not talking about you. Template:Smi Bearly541 20:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, because this admin was rude to me on this incident [1]. He has been stalking me since a prior incident. Bearly541 21:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Kalpesh on Wikipedia Again

Hello Root_Exploit, Thanx for your co-operation in being big discussion on Ankit Fadia Talk Page. I have answered your queries on. Please Check :

[2] http://kalpeshsharma.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/wikipedia-administrators-ankit-fadias-relatives/#comments

Thnaks a lot ! Kalpesh Sharma —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.201.77 (talk) 20 December 2006

Er, sorry, but I'm not sure what you're referring to? If we've had some communication in the past, I may need you to jog my memory. Luna Santin 21:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

why am i blocked?

why did you block "wikimaster,beter than you"??????????????????????????????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.41.12.21 (talk) 20 December 2006

mak82hyd

Thanks for ur help, I will make sure I keep calm and talk sense. regards. Mak82hyd 00:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I will, Thanks very much for ur warm advise and help. regards, Mak82hyd 00:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Recent Changes

Did you notice on RC that there are (-152) and (+155) on the changes? What do they mean? Bearly541 00:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Selena Protection

Luna, can you please protect Selena since she is a FA? Vandalism is currently occuring there. Bearly541 00:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays, Luna Santin! Template:Smi Wishing you a very happy holidays, full of laughter and good times! Hope you have an awesome beginning to 2007 as well! Template:Smi Best regards! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 01:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Failure

please don't change the failure passage back to the normal one. im trying to do this funny thing for my math teacher and when you change it it messes everything up —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

how do you do that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

i got it nevermind. thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

Wobble

I cant stand this user and the crap hes posting on here. I cant allow such anti-diversity, anti-racial, anti-ethnic things tobe posted on Wikipedia because even thoug hhe thinks hes doing something good, all it does is feed far-right, fascist, racists opionons who fear of losing their distinct identities, cultures and other features. Im sorry, but people like Wobble are a waste of air. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.107.88 (talk) 21 December 2006

Ok, I will try to make an official complaint about him with the measures you suggested. I like Wikipedia, and I only wish for it to have the most valid, factual, correct information and sources as well as trying to better human society rather than negatively and faslely altering or affecting peoples perceptions of the truth. 69.157.107.88 11:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

This user has a history of making personal attacks and has specifically targeted me for some reason. He has been blocked in the past for this sort of behaviour.[3] I don't know what his problem is, but he never participates in discussions on talk pages, and seems to think that all of the changes he doesn't like are somehow down to me (when often the changes were nothing to do with me). Often when changes are made they are the result of a discussion on the talk page. Alun 12:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• And you Wobbs have been consistently warned and near-blocked for vandalism and POV pushing. Read what I said above and that is my problem with you. Some of your opinions are dangerous and unwanted and I'll do everything I can on Wikipedia to stop someone from you pushing such an agenda. Your views insult aspects of peoples identity and distinctivess that they value, and such views need to be stopped. 69.157.107.88 12:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)