Jump to content

User talk:Starwars1955: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎No Personal Attacks: Sorry, forgot to sign
AdamWeeden (talk | contribs)
Request for civility.
Line 39: Line 39:
Would you both shut up, you don't run wikipedia, especially a stupid kid. {{unsigned|Starwars1955}}
Would you both shut up, you don't run wikipedia, especially a stupid kid. {{unsigned|Starwars1955}}
:Yes, it's true, I do not run wikipedia. However, neither do you; neither does any one person. We are a community, and it's hard to be a community when people make personal attacks and blank pages. So please, refrain from blanking your talk page, and refrain from making personal attacks. --[[User:King Bee|King Bee]] 21:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:Yes, it's true, I do not run wikipedia. However, neither do you; neither does any one person. We are a community, and it's hard to be a community when people make personal attacks and blank pages. So please, refrain from blanking your talk page, and refrain from making personal attacks. --[[User:King Bee|King Bee]] 21:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:Please try to be [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. Before making such a reply again please read through the article on [[wp:NO personal attacks|personal attacks]], expecially the section labelled consequences, particularly the part that states "Users have been [[Wikipedia:Banning policy | banned]] for repeatedly engaging in personal attacks. Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded." Thank you for your attention in this matter. I have [[|Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good faith]] that you really only desire to help improve WP. If we all start behaving with less hostility towards one another we may be able to accomplish something. [[User:AdamWeeden|<font face="tahoma, verdana, georgia, arial, sans-serif">Adam Weeden</font>]] 21:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

== No Personal Attacks ==
== No Personal Attacks ==



Revision as of 21:19, 22 December 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Jaranda wat's sup 03:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a wikipedia user and we are voting not to include the currently on pace stuff on this page, it's very unnessary because what Brett is on pace to do, isn't what he will do.


Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Brett Favre. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. PsyMar 07:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to check and see who posted the playoff stats, I typed all that and who included most of the records and milestones stats, those were me to, I built this site and quit telling me I'm deleting these people's stuff, they did't build this site, I did, I have a right to edit incorrect info and what Brett Favre is on pace to do is not his correct stats, and I may Edit.

I also placed a warning on the other person's page for adding it back repeatedly -- both of you are responsible for the edit war. Sort it out in the talk page. Also, please try to remember to use edit summaries. PsyMar 07:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that and I'm glad you have written me, it's a back and forth war about the current pace after the stats on the bottom, I wish you would allow me to edit it, it doesn't belong, what Brett is on pace to do is not what he will do and it's totally unnessary and I've gotten complaint emails, but everytime I edit it, it's gets put back on by the other person, right now it's voted 1-1 to remove it, but it shouldn't be there, Thanks, starwars1955

Why are you siding with them and protecting there addition to the current pace that doesn't belong there, they added that and your protecting that, this does fall under wikipedias NOR policy. Starwars1955

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Pilotguy (push to talk) 19:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Case

Hello Starwars1955, I'm Shadow1, the mediator for a case opened at the mediation cabal. When your block expires, please discuss the issues outlined on the case page at Talk:Brett Favre so that we can resolve this as quickly as possible. Thanks! Shadow1 (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

22 December 2006

Please stop. If you continue to use inappropiate or abusive edit summaries, you will be blocked for disruption. --King Bee 17:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No I won't so shut up king bee, I did no wrong so shut up or you'll be reported — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talkcontribs)

Yes, you did. I'm referring to this edit here. Your edit summary is unnecessarily volatile. Also, please don't tell me to shut up, because that sounds like a personal attack. Lastly, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes, like this ~~~~. Thank you. --King Bee 19:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking talk page

Please stop blanking your talk page. And please sign your posts with four ~ marks or pressing the sig button on the top bar. Your post should follow with ~~~~. ++aviper2k7++ 18:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please stop. It's against talk page guidelines. You're free to archive the page if you like, but not to blank. --King Bee 21:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you both shut up, you don't run wikipedia, especially a stupid kid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1955 (talkcontribs)

Yes, it's true, I do not run wikipedia. However, neither do you; neither does any one person. We are a community, and it's hard to be a community when people make personal attacks and blank pages. So please, refrain from blanking your talk page, and refrain from making personal attacks. --King Bee 21:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please try to be civil. Before making such a reply again please read through the article on personal attacks, expecially the section labelled consequences, particularly the part that states "Users have been banned for repeatedly engaging in personal attacks. Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded." Thank you for your attention in this matter. I have [[|Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good faith]] that you really only desire to help improve WP. If we all start behaving with less hostility towards one another we may be able to accomplish something. Adam Weeden 21:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Personal Attacks

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent personal attacks, as at User talk:Starwars1955, will not be tolerated. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Joseph Sanderson 21:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]