Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→User reported: removed report, user has been blocked since November 6th...how can it vandalize? no edits to its user page by anyone since Dec 7; list empty |
Swadhyayee (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Generally, make sure that he or she had vandalised SOON AFTER a {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}} or {{subst:bv}} warning. DO NOT REPORT A USER WHO HAS NOT VANDALIZED SINCE THE FINAL WARNING! |
Generally, make sure that he or she had vandalised SOON AFTER a {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}} or {{subst:bv}} warning. DO NOT REPORT A USER WHO HAS NOT VANDALIZED SINCE THE FINAL WARNING! |
||
--> |
--> |
||
More vulgar posts from John Leggott Sixth Form College [[User talk:194.83.71.232]]. I think that institutions with youngsters should simply be permanently blocked. The likelihood of a useful edit from such places is very small, and they end up wasting time of others, keeping them from the real working of improving Wikipedia. |
|||
Revision as of 15:47, 30 December 2006
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/header
Alerts
- 121.169.199.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined. I am not really sure what's happening here ... user hasn't been warned or reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
User reported
More vulgar posts from John Leggott Sixth Form College User talk:194.83.71.232. I think that institutions with youngsters should simply be permanently blocked. The likelihood of a useful edit from such places is very small, and they end up wasting time of others, keeping them from the real working of improving Wikipedia.