Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Wikipedia:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.
 Administrator intervention against vandalism
This page is intended for reports about obvious and persistent vandals and spammers only. Before posting here, please read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit a report, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues that require administrators, file an external request for administrator attention.

Important! Please remember the following:

  1. The edits of the reported user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
  2. The user must have been given enough warnings to stop their disruptive behavior.
  3. The warnings must have been given recently and the users must be active now, especially for unregistered users.
  4. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should go to AN/I, as a bot automatically removes accounts here that are blocked.

Feed-icon.svg You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 05:50 on 27 March 2015 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

Administrator instructions




Pictogram voting move light green.png This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to WP:ANEW. Jayron32 01:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined. I see lots of good-faith edits here, we have no reason to believe the page moves were intended to harm Wikipedia, rather than merely some mistakes or test edits. Hanlon's razor clearly applies here. Jayron32 01:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined. I don't see a vandalism-only account, many edits are not obviously vandalism. No comment on the SPI issue, it will be dealt with elsewhere. Jayron32 01:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • And he has just now continued the problem by reverting my deletion of his add of non-RS-sourced content here, without RS refs, in violation of wp:burden.
  • And he has just now followed me to yet another wp article I just edited this week, but that he never edited, which article is completely unrelated to his prior editing interests -- to add (in part) assertions not backed up by RSs. Here. Epeefleche (talk) 04:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • And he, just now, yet again continued the problem he had been warned about, which had been discussed with him on his tp, but reverting my deletion of his add of non-RS-sourced content here. Epeefleche (talk) 04:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)