Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furniture movers: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Delete''' I agree that there probably should be an article like this in the future but this one just doesn't seem worth it. --[[User:Tainter|Tainter]] 12:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' I agree that there probably should be an article like this in the future but this one just doesn't seem worth it. --[[User:Tainter|Tainter]] 12:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 13:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per above. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 13:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per |
*'''Delete''' per nomination; I'd recommend a speedy, but it still needs to go. --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] 21:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
*Why not '''move''' to [[List of moving companies]]? Offers three categories (which could probably be sourced from an industry list, they're valid as far as I can see, which is more than [[:Category:Moving companies]] -- which could but subcatted but is not heavily populated as it is. Alternatively, '''merge''' into [[moving company]]. There's actually a template {{tl|movers}}, too. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 18:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:42, 9 January 2007
Non-wikified list of U.S.-only moving companies, truck rental companies, etc. with no supporting text. May have been cut and pasted from somewhere else. David 11:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice. Presumably, an article could be written on this topic. This, though, isn't that article. In fact, this isn't an article. Arguably speedyable A1/A3. Serpent's Choice 11:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that there probably should be an article like this in the future but this one just doesn't seem worth it. --Tainter 12:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 13:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; I'd recommend a speedy, but it still needs to go. --Mhking 21:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)