| Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
| old stuff |
7 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 1#old stuff
|
| Merged demarcation sections |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Merged demarcation sections
|
| Thank you |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Thank you
|
| Critical Tests |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Critical Tests
|
| Theory refinement |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Theory refinement
|
| Intro |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Intro
|
| POV in solipsism? |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#POV in solipsism?
|
| Swans |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Swans
|
| Astrology does not make falsifiable predictions |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Astrology does not make falsifiable predictions
|
| Minor edit: Falsificationism |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Minor edit: Falsificationism
|
| Economics |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Economics
|
| Popper's swan argument |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Popper's swan argument
|
| Criticism from scientists |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Criticism from scientists
|
| Poor example moved to talk page for discussion |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Poor example moved to talk page for discussion
|
| Incompleteness of Falsification |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Incompleteness of Falsification
|
| Popper project |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Popper project
|
| Examples |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Examples
|
| Empirical & Formal, Secular & Eternal |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Empirical & Formal, Secular & Eternal
|
| Is Epistemological Solipsism Falsifiable? |
8 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Is Epistemological Solipsism Falsifiable?
|
| Metaphysical solipsism falsifiable? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Metaphysical solipsism falsifiable?
|
| What is falsifiability anyway? |
19 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#What is falsifiability anyway?
|
| Maths |
8 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Maths
|
| Statements and theories |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Statements and theories
|
| Mathematics Section |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Mathematics Section
|
| Mathematics — Deleted Material |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Mathematics — Deleted Material
|
| Your Thematics & My Thematics |
8 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Your Thematics & My Thematics
|
| Stephen Wolfram |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Stephen Wolfram
|
| {fact} = {citation needed} |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#{fact} = {citation needed}
|
| Conspiracy theories |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Conspiracy theories
|
| Conspiracy theories |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Conspiracy theories
|
| The intro asserts the Popper POV |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#The intro asserts the Popper POV
|
| "Contingent" is different from "Falsifiable" |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#"Contingent" is different from "Falsifiable"
|
| Why "many"? Explanation needed. |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Why "many"? Explanation needed.
|
| Macroevolution/Darwinism |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Macroevolution/Darwinism
|
| Too technical |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Too technical
|
| Not all swans are birds |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Not all swans are birds
|
| Examples section is mostly original research |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Examples section is mostly original research
|
| Nitpick on physics section |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Nitpick on physics section
|
| Forbid? |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Forbid?
|
| Necessary? |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Necessary?
|
| Removed content |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Removed content
|
| Featured Article Candidate? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Featured Article Candidate?
|
| Cause and Effect |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Cause and Effect
|
| '"God doesn't exist" is falsifiable' |
9 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#'"God doesn't exist" is falsifiable'
|
| "Little Green Men" |
9 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#"Little Green Men"
|
| Rational scepticism project |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Rational scepticism project
|
| Theism |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Theism
|
| Can research ethics preclude falsifiability? |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Can research ethics preclude falsifiability?
|
| Popper and confirmation |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Popper and confirmation
|
| Removed material from the lead |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Removed material from the lead
|
| Economics |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Economics 2
|
| sourcing and OR |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#sourcing and OR
|
| All men are mortal |
24 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#All men are mortal
|
| Falsifiability of Evolution |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Falsifiability of Evolution
|
| Memetics |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Memetics
|
| moved section |
7 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#moved section
|
| Naïve falsification |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 2#Naïve falsification
|
| Stanford description |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Stanford description
|
| Recent edits |
7 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Recent edits
|
| 150 years example |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#150 years example
|
| Naïve Falsification |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Naïve Falsification
|
| Falsibiability and Physics |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Falsibiability and Physics
|
| Merge with Testability |
9 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Merge with Testability
|
| Is "people have souls" nonfalsifiable? |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Is "people have souls" nonfalsifiable?
|
| Paraphrased list of Popper's observations |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Paraphrased list of Popper's observations
|
| Quantum Mechanics |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Quantum Mechanics
|
| Language too complex |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Language too complex
|
| Logic |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Logic
|
| Logical Possibility |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Logical Possibility
|
| "Theism" section is just asking for trouble. |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#"Theism" section is just asking for trouble.
|
| Swans |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Swans
|
| removing quote "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong" |
9 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#removing quote "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong"
|
| God's existence irrelevant to Falsification/Falsifiabiltiy |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#God's existence irrelevant to Falsification/Falsifiabiltiy
|
| Check for copyright infringement |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Check for copyright infringement
|
| Null of Green Swan |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Null of Green Swan
|
| Aren't all positive claims falsifiable? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Aren't all positive claims falsifiable?
|
| Confusion between logical and belief falsification |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Confusion between logical and belief falsification
|
| Why the "atoms do exist" example? |
19 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Why the "atoms do exist" example?
|
| A theory not scientific until we know where it fails? |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#A theory not scientific until we know where it fails?
|
| Falsifiable-statements and Godel-statements |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Falsifiable-statements and Godel-statements
|
| All swans are white is not falsifiable |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#All swans are white is not falsifiable
|
| Deletions |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Deletions
|
| Global warming |
14 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Global warming
|
| Original research by Rtc |
12 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Original research by Rtc
|
| Confusing usage of "public" and "public school" |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Confusing usage of "public" and "public school"
|
| Re: Examples of "unfalsifiable" statements in Overview section |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Re: Examples of "unfalsifiable" statements in Overview section
|
| Criticism section has bad citations |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 3#Criticism section has bad citations
|
| Theories as Tools |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Theories as Tools
|
| Swannage |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Swannage
|
| John Stuart Mill left out? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#John Stuart Mill left out?
|
| Typo / incorrect meaning |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Typo / incorrect meaning
|
| Scope Creep? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Scope Creep?
|
| I differ in your WORD meanings |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#I differ in your WORD meanings
|
| Future fixes |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Future fixes
|
| misqouted |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#misqouted
|
| Falsifiability? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Falsifiability?
|
| Proved and Proven |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Proved and Proven
|
| Claims about the meaning of 'pseudoscience' |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Claims about the meaning of 'pseudoscience'
|
| External links modified |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#External links modified
|
| Bad title for the article |
23 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Bad title for the article
|
| There are gorillas in Africa |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#There are gorillas in Africa
|
| Logical refutation is not useful in the definition of falsifiability, only confusing. |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Logical refutation is not useful in the definition of falsifiability, only confusing.
|
| Missing reference for The concern with falsifiability gained attention |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Missing reference for The concern with falsifiability gained attention
|
| The subsection mathematics of criticisms seems a personal opinion |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The subsection mathematics of criticisms seems a personal opinion
|
| Link to Google Books as a source? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Link to Google Books as a source?
|
| He [Popper] saw falsifiability as the criterion for demarcating the limits of scientific inquiry. |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#He [Popper] saw falsifiability as the criterion for demarcating the limits of scientific inquiry.
|
| Removing the external links section |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Removing the external links section
|
| Example from Popper of a falsifiable theory that has not been and would not be falsified so soon |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Example from Popper of a falsifiable theory that has not been and would not be falsified so soon
|
| Moving the section Comtemporary philosophers section in the Popper article |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Moving the section Comtemporary philosophers section in the Popper article
|
| Refocusing on falsifiability and using more of Lakatos |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Refocusing on falsifiability and using more of Lakatos
|
| More about the section Mathematics |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#More about the section Mathematics
|
| More on the section Comtemporary philosophers |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#More on the section Comtemporary philosophers
|
| Invalid support for "Popper stressed that unfalsifiable statements are important in science." |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Invalid support for "Popper stressed that unfalsifiable statements are important in science."
|
| Presentation of facts about the Daubert standard are biased. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Presentation of facts about the Daubert standard are biased.
|
| About the contemporary philosophers section: the opinion of Bartley III |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#About the contemporary philosophers section: the opinion of Bartley III
|
| Lakatos Vs Popper |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Lakatos Vs Popper
|
| The terms observational and categorical in titles are not used in the text |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The terms observational and categorical in titles are not used in the text
|
| Avoiding confusion with the ordinary notion of falsifiability in the lead section. |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Avoiding confusion with the ordinary notion of falsifiability in the lead section.
|
| "All swans are white" to illustrate the problem of induction is not from Popper. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#"All swans are white" to illustrate the problem of induction is not from Popper.
|
| Two types of statements: observational and categorical |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Two types of statements: observational and categorical
|
| Mismatch between the title for the section "Naive Falsificationism" and its content. |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Mismatch between the title for the section "Naive Falsificationism" and its content.
|
| The section Inductive categorical inference |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The section Inductive categorical inference
|
| The subsection Deductive falsification, about modus tollens |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The subsection Deductive falsification, about modus tollens
|
| Section Naïve falsification - mismatch with definition found in the literature. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Section Naïve falsification - mismatch with definition found in the literature.
|
| Use of Modus Tollens |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Use of Modus Tollens
|
| The section Criticism contains anything but criticisms of Popper's falsifiability |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The section Criticism contains anything but criticisms of Popper's falsifiability
|
| The term 'Metaphysical Research Program' is not used properly. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The term 'Metaphysical Research Program' is not used properly.
|
| Case of DNS records |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Case of DNS records
|
| Regarding the added "... or observation": clarifying the empirical status of basic statements |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Regarding the added "... or observation": clarifying the empirical status of basic statements
|
| And rejected logical inconsistency as a criterion for falsification |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#And rejected logical inconsistency as a criterion for falsification
|
| "All swans are white" can be proven false and is, hence, a falsifiable statement, |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#"All swans are white" can be proven false and is, hence, a falsifiable statement,
|
| Academic Paralysis here, & Communication |
13 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Academic Paralysis here, & Communication
|
| The distinction between the two meanings of falsifiability is NOT trivial. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#The distinction between the two meanings of falsifiability is NOT trivial.
|
| Before you edit the lead or any other part of the article, read this correctly |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Before you edit the lead or any other part of the article, read this correctly
|
| Removing the {{cn}} tag in the caption |
13 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Removing the {{cn}} tag in the caption
|
| Modifying the caption for the image |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#Modifying the caption for the image
|
| What's the point of the controversies section? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 4#What's the point of the controversies section?
|
| Statement of the obvious |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Statement of the obvious
|
| Re-write needed |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Re-write needed
|
| The awkward tag |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#The awkward tag
|
| Clearer lead |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Clearer lead
|
| Not much can be said based on the naive definition, only confusion. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Not much can be said based on the naive definition, only confusion.
|
| Does Wikipedia need this article? |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Does Wikipedia need this article?
|
| Unsourced debate about the subject of critical rationalism |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Unsourced debate about the subject of critical rationalism
|
| Lead |
44 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Lead
|
| Restructure and edit |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Restructure and edit
|
| Unverifiable and unclear paragraph |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Unverifiable and unclear paragraph
|
| What I did to improve the section Problem of induction |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#What I did to improve the section Problem of induction
|
| Confusing section: Demarcation problem |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Confusing section: Demarcation problem
|
| Sokal and Bricmont |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Sokal and Bricmont
|
| citations for naive falsification |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#citations for naive falsification
|
| dogmatic falsificationist |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#dogmatic falsificationist
|
| Formalizing Modus tollens and link to fallacies are not useful |
7 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Formalizing Modus tollens and link to fallacies are not useful
|
| Technical article or brief jump-off point? |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Technical article or brief jump-off point?
|
| Demarcation |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Demarcation
|
| We must consider the growth of knowledge |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#We must consider the growth of knowledge
|
| Away from naive falsificationism |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Away from naive falsificationism
|
| Section Criticisms |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Section Criticisms
|
| The technical tag at the top of this talk page |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#The technical tag at the top of this talk page
|
| The lead is inadequate |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#The lead is inadequate
|
| Attempt to improve the lead |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Attempt to improve the lead
|
| Section Young-earth creationism must be rewritten |
26 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Section Young-earth creationism must be rewritten
|
| Non verified and, I believe, non verifiable statement |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Non verified and, I believe, non verifiable statement
|
| Planned modifications to correct for a missing definition |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Planned modifications to correct for a missing definition
|
| The empirical basis and falsifiability |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#The empirical basis and falsifiability
|
| Redirects |
25 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Redirects
|
| Further reading section |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Further reading section
|
| Problem with The demarcation problem section |
5 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 5#Problem with The demarcation problem section
|
| Mayo's Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge as a source |
15 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Mayo's Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge as a source
|
| Logical positivism, logical empiricism, Vienna Circle, Berlin Circle and other centers of the movement. |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Logical positivism, logical empiricism, Vienna Circle, Berlin Circle and other centers of the movement.
|
| Dienes as a source |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Dienes as a source
|
| Popper introduced faslfiability as an attempt to solve ... |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Popper introduced faslfiability as an attempt to solve ...
|
| Occurences of the term "falsifiability" over the years. |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Occurences of the term "falsifiability" over the years.
|
| Clarifying the purpose of the section (alias) Problem of Induction |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Clarifying the purpose of the section (alias) Problem of Induction
|
| New examples about natural selection |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#New examples about natural selection
|
| Expanding on examples similar to "All men are mortal" |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Expanding on examples similar to "All men are mortal"
|
| Use Wikipedia style for placement of reference numbers |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Use Wikipedia style for placement of reference numbers
|
| Removing red raven in the lead and thoughts about existential statements |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#Removing red raven in the lead and thoughts about existential statements
|
| New sub-sections about the Popper-Lakatos controversy |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#New sub-sections about the Popper-Lakatos controversy
|
| New subsection after the definition of falsifiability or in the controversy section |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#New subsection after the definition of falsifiability or in the controversy section
|
| A subsection or extra text in the section The problem of induction |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 6#A subsection or extra text in the section The problem of induction
|
| Where is the rational part in "Critical rationalism"? |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Where is the rational part in "Critical rationalism"?
|
| Meta-induction, model for growth of scientific knowledge, Schurz, etc. (for ease of editing) |
38 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Meta-induction, model for growth of scientific knowledge, Schurz, etc. (for ease of editing)
|
| Original research in the comparison of "negative pragmatism" with falsifiability. |
1 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Original research in the comparison of "negative pragmatism" with falsifiability.
|
| A basic statement in industrial melanism. |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#A basic statement in industrial melanism.
|
| Sources with a synthesis of the common and technical definitions |
6 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Sources with a synthesis of the common and technical definitions
|
| The recent modifications |
9 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#The recent modifications
|
| Dense language |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Dense language
|
| RfC: Adding a challenging, counterintuitive but instructive and well sourced example in the lead |
33 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#RfC: Adding a challenging, counterintuitive but instructive and well sourced example in the lead
|
| The problem with new and incomplete theories which aren't falsifiable at birth but might evolve to be later |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#The problem with new and incomplete theories which aren't falsifiable at birth but might evolve to be later
|
| Checking how the 170K distribute over sections |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Checking how the 170K distribute over sections
|
| Broken redirects |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Broken redirects
|
| Still garbage 10 years later. |
16 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 7#Still garbage 10 years later.
|
| Creating an article on falsificationism |
56 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 8#Creating an article on falsificationism
|
| Grave abuse of footnotes |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 8#Grave abuse of footnotes
|
| False statement in the lede (highlighted) |
14 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 8#False statement in the lede (highlighted)
|
| Extreme request for mechanical verification in the lead. |
30 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 9#Extreme request for mechanical verification in the lead.
|
| Some concepts to put falsifiability in context |
7 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 9#Some concepts to put falsifiability in context
|
| Subtle but important point regarding the material condition. |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability/Archive 9#Subtle but important point regarding the material condition.
|
| I propose to undo the last edits by IP 140.78.5.108 |
3 |
Talk:Falsifiability#I propose to undo the last edits by IP 140.78.5.108
|
| The lede |
2 |
Talk:Falsifiability#The lede
|
| Headings |
4 |
Talk:Falsifiability#Headings
|
