User talk:Legobot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Legobot Legobot II Legobot III Hockeybot ArticleAlertbot TFA Protector

Tennessee Aquarium[edit]

Your bot got it wrong. It passed.
Wikipedia:Good article nominations‎; 10:41 . . (-123)‎ . . ‎Legobot (talk | contribs)‎ (Failed Tennessee Aquarium On review Operation Infinite Reach by Kabahaly) [rollback]
Thanks. 16:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC) 7&6=thirteen () 20:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Closing a RfC after the it has expired[edit]

Am I allowed to close the RfC after it has expired and Logobot has removed the template [1]? Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Tnguyen4321: Legobot never closes RfCs. Once thirty days have elapsed from the first timestamp that follows the {{rfc}} template (in this case 07:31, 22 July 2016), Legobot removes the {{rfc}} template (example), and also removes the entry from each of the sections of WP:RFC/A where it had been listed (example). Re-adding the {{rfc}} template - as Dino nam (talk · contribs) did here - is ineffective because the 30-day period has already passed and Legobot will merely remove it again.
Closure - that is, evaluating the various points and summarising these to determine an outcome - is beyond the abilities of any bot and so is necessarily a human task. More information at WP:RFCEND. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 22:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Late invitatation to RFC parties[edit]

Hi, Mister Lego. I am wondering why you always seem to submit my input for RFC's after the discussion seems to be over already. Is there any way to notify me in a more timely manner? Thanx very much. Costatitanica (talk) 19:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Screwed up when 2 RFCs got posted at the same time[edit]

See [2] and [3]. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

@Headbomb: This is a known problem. The solution is to remove the |rfcid= parameter from one (not both) of the {{rfc}} templates, like this, this forces Legobot to issue a new unique rfcid for the rfc from which the rfcid has been removed; this also forces a fix to the RfC listing page(s). The prevention is to make sure that no more than one {{rfc}} that lacks an |rfcid= is added to a given discussion page at once, and to ensure that Legobot has added an rfcid to that before you add the next {{rfc}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Legobot down[edit]

Legobot will be down for a few hours. Legoktm (talk) 15:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Legoktm, it's been over a day and a half. Any idea of when you think it might be back up? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
+1. Me like Legobot. Me need Legobot. ―Mandruss  08:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
The rest of Wikipedia is waiting. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
@Legoktm: GA Cup 2016–2017 is on run. The GA nominations page needs constant update for smooth functioning of the contest. Hope the bot will be back soon and wish you all the best in bringing it back. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay, everything should be up and running again. I was rotating the password for the account, and that took longer than I hoped due to IRL obligations. Legoktm (talk) 20:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Functioning error[edit]

Recently the bot performed wrongly while closing a GA nomination. Actually Sam Manekshaw passed the GA review (3rd nomination) and listed warfare good article by the reviewer. Please see the review page and talk page of the article. But the bot notified that the review failed on my talk page, and also the good article top-icon was not added the article. Kindly look into the issue. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)