Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:04, 23 February 2007

Case Filed On: 17:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

Dacy69 (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Fadix (talk · contribs)
Fedayee (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Armenian Revolutionary Federation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

Answer:Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

Answer: Content Dispute and Personal Attack

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

Answer:I was insulted two times. I see no avenue to resort to dispute resoltuon except Arbitration

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

Answer:Proper editing and punishment of users who constantly insult

Summary:

On page Armenian Revolutionary Federation I made edit based on the referenced information. I wanted add more sources and more information but the page got protected. Without much discussion user Fadix insulted me 2 times [1] and threatened with edit revenge on other Wiki pages [2]. User Fedayee also insulted me, in supporting Fadix claim [3]. I filed 2 complains about personal attacks but no measure has been taken except warning for 1st insults after which Fadix insulted a second time.

Discussion:

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: Template:AMA case status

Advocate Status:

None assigned.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<big>'''Case Filed On:''' 17:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)</big>
-Please note:
+'''Wikipedian filing request:'''
-The following commercial websites keep getting added in the category
+<!-- Do not change anything here. -->
-"Telecommunications Broker"
+* {{user|Dacy69}}
+'''Other Wikipedians this pertains to:'''
-http://aussiephonebrokers.com.au/
+<!-- Follow STEP 3 below -->
+* {{user|Fadix}}
+* {{user|Fedayee}}
+'''Wikipedia pages this pertains to:'''
-http://www.auditelinc.com/
+<!-- Follow STEP 4 below -->
+* {{La|Armenian Revolutionary Federation}}
+==Questions:==
+<!-- Follow STEP 5 below -->
+'''Have you read the [[Wikipedia:AMA FAQs|AMA FAQ]]?'''
+*Answer:Yes
+'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
+*Answer: Content Dispute and Personal Attack
+'''What methods of [[WP:DR|Dispute Resolution]] have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
+*Answer:I was insulted two times. I see no avenue to resort to dispute resoltuon except Arbitration
+'''What do you expect to get from [[WP:AMA|Advocacy]]?'''
+*Answer:Proper editing and punishment of users who constantly insult
+==Summary:==
+<!-- Follow the instructions for STEP 6 below -->
+On page [[Armenian Revolutionary Federation]] I made edit based on the referenced information. I wanted add more sources and more information but the page got protected. Without much discussion user Fadix insulted me 2 times [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AArmenian_Revolutionary_Federation&diff=107861782&oldid=107825098] and threatened with edit revenge on other Wiki pages [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AArmenian_Revolutionary_Federation&diff=108546123&oldid=108511090]. User Fedayee also insulted me, in supporting Fadix claim [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AArmenian_Revolutionary_Federation&diff=108506684&oldid=108506514]. I filed 2 complains about personal attacks but no measure has been taken except warning for 1st insults after which Fadix insulted a second time.
+==Discussion:==
+<!-- Your Advocate will discuss the case with you in this section. -->
+==Followup:==
+When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
+'''Did you find the Advocacy process useful?'''
+*Answer:
+'''Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?'''
+*Answer:
+'''On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?'''
+*Answer:
+'''On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?'''
+*Answer:
+'''On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?'''
+*Answer:
+'''If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?'''
+*Answer:
+'''If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?'''
+*Answer:
+<!-- PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE: The following is for AMA use. -->
+==AMA Information==
+<!-- The AMA case status template is CASE SENSITITIVE can ONLY be set to:
+) "new" - for new cases
+) "pending" - for cases pending an Advocate
+) "open" - for cases that have been opened
+) "closed" - for cases that have been closed
+) "investigation" - for cases that are under investigation (i.e. need Coorinator, Deputy and/or other fellow Advocate intervention)
+-->
+'''Case Status:''' {{AMA case status|new}}
+'''Advocate Status:'''
+*None assigned.