Talk:Canceled Apollo missions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:55, 10 May 2007

This site is very good. Now you found better informations about apollo 21 than me. I am from germany and have found only stubs about apollo 21, but you better refered this site.

Many thanks from Germany by Philipp Mevius, Eckernförde September 20, 2005

Numbers by Names!

The cancelled missions apollo 18 to 20 are needed for skylab, but they have not numbers. Apollo 21 would not named in the sixties. But the Apollo-Sujus-Test-Project is the 21st (twenty-first) start of the Apollo Commmand module in July 1975.

Many thanks from Germany by Philipp Mevius, Eckernförde september 26, 2005

Not quite sure what you are saying but I'm guessing you're suggesting that the three manned Skylab flights were in fact Apollo 18-20 and ASTP was Apollo 21. This isn't correct. Skylab was a completely different program that just happened to use the same hardware as the Apollo lunar landing program. ASTP is sometimes called Apollo 18, though this is incorrect as during its flight, the callsign used just Apollo. Evil Monkey∴Hello 06:34, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of Roosa i would prohiby Tom Stafford for the Command of the apollo 20 mission, because he was not allowed to land with apollo 10 in may 1969. It would be better you numbered the three skylab missions as apollo 18 through 20 and ASTP as apollo 21, then it is same hardware of the apollo/saturn programm. Maybe the NASA changed the titles of the apollo applications program into the apollo by numbers.

P. Mevius 12th May 2005

Canceled?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7mkHtuLOs Half way in theres a alien craft. I don't know..

Where they really canceled? They could be lying to us. I want to believe. This video does look real. Too real. Joerite 21:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The patch briefly shown at the front includes "Leonov". The blue datascreen that follows is from an in-flight Apollo 11 film. The text at the bottom is apparently talking to Vandenberg... it's only ten seconds in, and we've racked up three bits of silliness. I wish they could at least construct plausibly consistent hoaxes... Shimgray | talk | 21:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:54, 10 May 2007 edit Andrew Gray (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 55,855 edits →‎Canceled? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:55, 10 May 2007 edit undo Andrew Gray (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 55,855 edits →‎Canceled? Next edit →
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Where they really canceled? They could be lying to us. I want to believe. This video does look real. Too real. [[User:Joerite\|Joerite]] 21:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)		Where they really canceled? They could be lying to us. I want to believe. This video does look real. Too real. [[User:Joerite\|Joerite]] 21:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

	:The patch briefly shown at the front includes "Leonov". The blue datascreen that follows is from an in-flight Apollo 11 film. The text at the bottom is apparently talking to Vandenberg. I wish they could at least construct ''plausibly consistent'' hoaxes... [[User:Shimgray\|Shimgray]] \| [[User talk:Shimgray\|talk]] \| 21:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)		:The patch briefly shown at the front includes "Leonov". The blue datascreen that follows is from an in-flight Apollo 11 film. The text at the bottom is apparently talking to Vandenberg... it's only ten seconds in, and we've racked up three bits of silliness. I wish they could at least construct ''plausibly consistent'' hoaxes... [[User:Shimgray\|Shimgray]] \| [[User talk:Shimgray\|talk]] \| 21:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)