Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aegis (online game): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:09, 25 June 2008

Aegis (online game)

No claims of notability, fails WP:WEB, no citations from reliable, third-party, published sources, past (and likely future) copyright violations due to publisher being involved with editing. Wyatt Riot (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your first, second and third argument is one and the same.

Past violations is by no means a reason to delete a current, non-violating article. If it were, a vandal could insert copyrighted material on any and all articles he wanted removed.

Likely future violation??? Well now, this is notable indeed, let's create an article.

Ryttaren (talk) 14:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Written like an advertisement; no NPOV, no verifiable sources. MuZemike (talk) 23:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT delete - this article was useful to me, and most likely is and will be to others wikipedians as well. In my view, this is the essence of Wikipedia. Ryttaren (talk) 12:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :{{la|Aegis (online game)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Aegis (online game)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aegis (online game)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aegis (online game)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 23#{{anchorencode:Aegis (online game)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 No claims of [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]], fails [[WP:WEB]], no [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|citations from reliable, third-party, published sources]], past (and likely future) [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violations]] due to publisher being involved with editing. [[User:Wyatt Riot|Wyatt Riot]] ([[User talk:Wyatt Riot|talk]]) 10:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
+::Your first, second and third argument is '''one and the same'''.
+::'''Past''' violations is by no means a reason to delete a current, non-violating article. If it were, a vandal could insert copyrighted material on any and all articles he wanted removed.
+::'''Likely future violation'''??? Well now, this is notable indeed, let's [[Future_violations|create an article]].
+::[[User:Ryttaren|Ryttaren]] ([[User talk:Ryttaren|talk]]) 14:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * <span style="font-size: smaller;">Note: This debate has been added to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game related deletions]]. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 14:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)</span>