User talk:Dalej78: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:29, 18 March 2009

I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Wikipedia. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Wikipedia, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Wikipedia is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories.

WP:3RR on Barack Obama

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Grsz¹¹ 01:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For disruptive edit-warring I have blocked you for 24 hours under the terms of the probation. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} CIreland (talk) 13:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Barack Obama|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Barack Obama]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''[[User:Grsz11|<font color="black">Grsz</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Grsz11|<b><font color="red">11</font></b>]]</sup>''' 01:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
+== Blocked ==
+You were previously notified that {{la|Barack Obama}} is subject to article probation: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dalej78&diff=276029859&oldid=275188690]. You have recently edit warred at the article, making the same edit four times:
+* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&diff=277986223&oldid=277949383
+* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&diff=278002046&oldid=278000643
+* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&diff=278005300&oldid=278002983
+* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&diff=278019651&oldid=278006102
+For disruptive edit-warring I have blocked you for 24 hours under the terms of the probation. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> [[User:CIreland|CIreland]] ([[User talk:CIreland|talk]]) 13:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)