Talk:Shell Exploration and Production Ireland: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:54, 10 August 2009

Energy NA‑class

	Energy portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Revert

SEPIL doesn't just operate in Ireland, it operates solely in Ireland. Shell deals in more than just oil. The Corrib gas project is highly controversial; see Corrib gas controversy. SEPIL also has licences for oil exploration, so it's not just a gas company. There's no need for the Shell category as the Corrib category is already a subcategory of it. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content Move

Just two points - 1) Gainline was referencing this, and 2) reverting because "not all of [the content was merged]" when the only bit of content that wasn't is an image of dubious WP:NPOV status, and isn't really related to the company in question is a bit of a stretch. If you truly do feel stongly LP, please discuss instead of blind reverts. Thanks! Fin ©™ 17:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't advice to move, it's advice about moving. Why not just add to the original article, or is that too much like work? Why do you believe the picture is POV? To contend it's not related to the article is risible. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, I was satisfied that the correct protocol was followed and that this info was sufficiently covered as part of Royal Dutch Shell article. The picture is obviously taken by somebody involved in the campaign and was introducing anti-shell bias and also would have been Wp:Undue in such a large article G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 18:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does the picture introduce bias? Why did the thought not occur to you to research SEPIL and contribute to Wikipedia's store of knowledge? Your first instinct was to delete, wasn't it? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:28, 10 August 2009 edit GainLine (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 4,982 edits →‎Content Move: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:54, 10 August 2009 edit undo Lapsed Pacifist (talk \| contribs) 18,229 edits →‎Content Move Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Correct, I was satisfied that the correct protocol was followed and that this info was sufficiently covered as part of Royal Dutch Shell article. The picture is obviously taken by somebody involved in the campaign and was introducing anti-shell bias and also would have been [[Wp:Undue]] in such a large article [[User:GainLine\|<font face="jokerman" color="navy">'''G'''<small><s>ain</s></small>'''Line '''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/GainLine\|<font color="black">♠</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:GainLine\|<font color="red">♥</font>]]</sub> 18:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)		Correct, I was satisfied that the correct protocol was followed and that this info was sufficiently covered as part of Royal Dutch Shell article. The picture is obviously taken by somebody involved in the campaign and was introducing anti-shell bias and also would have been [[Wp:Undue]] in such a large article [[User:GainLine\|<font face="jokerman" color="navy">'''G'''<small><s>ain</s></small>'''Line '''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/GainLine\|<font color="black">♠</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:GainLine\|<font color="red">♥</font>]]</sub> 18:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

			:How does the picture introduce bias? Why did the thought not occur to you to research SEPIL and contribute to Wikipedia's store of knowledge? Your first instinct was to delete, wasn't it? [[User:Lapsed Pacifist\|Lapsed Pacifist]] ([[User talk:Lapsed Pacifist\|talk]]) 18:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)