User talk:79.72.128.246

June 2010

Please do not make unsupported accusations as you have done on User talk:MsGanda Active Banana (talk) 01:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Your claim of Isang Lakas being mentioned AT ALL in the links that you have added is not supported by the actual text of the links. Active Banana (talk) 01:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Isang Lakas, you may be blocked from editing. The sources DO NOT repeat DO NOT mention the show Isang Lakas at all. They cannot in any way be used to verify that certain actors or characters will be appearing in the show. Such an assumption on your part is a complete violation of WP:OR. Active Banana (talk) 14:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Isang Lakas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Active Banana (talk) 17:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop or you WILL be blocked for your continued vandalism. Take your reasoning to the article talk page, the mere fact that one company or another owns the rights to a character is no indication that such a character will appear in a particular series. Active Banana (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

RE "How am I gonna do that. Read the article carefully, it says it right there.) " You will post a link on the talk page and then quote the line from the source that says the particular actor/character will be in Isang Lakas. If the source does not have that statement, then you're probably not "gonna be able to do that". Active Banana (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

For example, it would look like this sourced content that is left in the article Active Banana (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2010 (UTC):

• [1] says "Jon also revealed his plans for this year, which includes getting into even better shape for his next projects like reprising his role as Kapitan Boom in Sanlakas"

Do you mean that somewhere in the forum postings after the main article some reader has said that the actor will be in the series? Only the actual article itself is a potential source, forum postings are never considered reliable sources. Active Banana (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:NPA

Do not make baseless acusations of people being sockpuppets on their user talk pages or elsewhere within Wikipedia. If you think that the accounts are being used inappropriately you need to file a report at WP:SSP. Active Banana (talk) 19:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

• Then what is the point of the tag"{{sock}}"?, if everything have to reported directly there.--79.72.128.246 (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
  • It is for use AFTER you have submitted a request for investigation that includes actual evidence. Active Banana (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
    • I already did
      • Where? When? There is no indication in the current SSP page, and if the admins did not take action on a previous investigation that you filed, then you have even LESS basis to throw around accusations that have been PROVEN FALSE. Active Banana (talk) 19:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
        • Proven false? Please let us see this proof. Or are you their sockpuppet? --79.72.128.246 (talk) 00:36, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes proven false. If as you claim you submitted a report at WP:SSP and the administrators had found proof of sockpuppeting, they would have identified/blocked/warned the sockpuppetors. The fact that they didnt is proof that you cannot continue to make baseless accusations of sockpuppetry. Active Banana (talk) 00:46, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

• • • • • • It takes time dumby.--79.72.128.246 (talk) 00:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Active Banana (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Your actions are currently being discussed at the WP:ANI notice board

Your actions are currently being discussed at: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:79.72.128.246_inserting_unsourced_content_and_making_accusations_of_sockpuppetry Active Banana (talk) 01:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

• File:MarioSMBW.png *I'ma scarrred.*