Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rileah Vanderbilt: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Rileah Vanderbilt: - comment - remove vote from single-purpose account |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*The problem is that that is a BLP violation, a BLP needs reliable sources so that potentially challenged material can be backed up. If it doesn't have reliable sources that's not grounds for inclusion on Wikipedia. —<span style="font-family:Tahoma;">'''[[User:Fridae'sDoom|<font color=red>Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм</font>]]</span> • <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-variant:small-caps;">[[User talk:Fridae'sDoom|<font color=grey>Champagne?</font>]] • 11:17am •'''</span> 00:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''RETAIN''' It cites many of the same sources as any other BLP who happens to act. Look at Alan Tudyk, he's got many of the same sites as references. What's the problem? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Erafalko|Erafalko]] ([[User talk:Erafalko|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erafalko|contribs]]) 22:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|Erafalko}} |
|||
Revision as of 00:17, 7 October 2010
- Rileah Vanderbilt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that cites many unreliable sources such as IMDB, Official Star Wars Fan Film Challenge Web Site, Break.com, Action Flick Chick, MrDisgusting and ShockTillYouDrop.com. Google search cannot return reputable sources. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 7:16pm • 09:16, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Not only are there no reliable sources, the roles are all trivial. Edward321 (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that that is a BLP violation, a BLP needs reliable sources so that potentially challenged material can be backed up. If it doesn't have reliable sources that's not grounds for inclusion on Wikipedia. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 11:17am • 00:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)