Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Turinah: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== template shortcoming == |
== template shortcoming == |
||
The [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Turinah|obverse]] indicates there is a venue for further discussion which there doesn't appear to be. Before now I've seen cases like this resolved when the permanent article was seated and the deletionists are pushed back by the just noteworthiness of the subject. From what little I know of this one there was no reason to believe there was a purposeful hoax, and more irritatingly there was discussion germane to a number of issues of significance to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People|longevity project]] now lost. |
The [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Turinah|obverse]] indicates there is a venue for further discussion which there doesn't appear to be. Before now I've seen cases like this resolved when the permanent article was seated and the deletionists are pushed back by the just noteworthiness of the subject. From what little I know of this one there was no reason to believe there was a purposeful hoax, and more irritatingly there was discussion germane to a number of issues of significance to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People|longevity project]] now lost. |
||
{{Image|File:Turinah.jpg|150px|link=http://www.torontosun.com/news/weird/2010/06/08/14306001.html}} [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 21:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
{{Image|NonFreeImageRemoved.svg <!--Fair-Use ([[:File:Turinah.jpg]]) File Removed by DASHBot-->|150px|link=http://www.torontosun.com/news/weird/2010/06/08/14306001.html}} [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 21:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:03, 1 March 2011
template shortcoming
The obverse indicates there is a venue for further discussion which there doesn't appear to be. Before now I've seen cases like this resolved when the permanent article was seated and the deletionists are pushed back by the just noteworthiness of the subject. From what little I know of this one there was no reason to believe there was a purposeful hoax, and more irritatingly there was discussion germane to a number of issues of significance to the longevity project now lost. Template:Image 72.228.177.92 (talk) 21:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)