User talk:Morton devonshire: Difference between revisions

Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Morton_devonshire.

Wikimedia Foundation

Contents

Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes Closed

See this book review[1], where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work.

Take a look at Roland Rance

I tagged Roland Rance with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. Crockspot 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another list of pages

User:Rhobite/9/11 watchlist

Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General Motors streetcar conspiracy - more cruft for you. Have fun. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 12:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Pearl

[2] Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight. Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD. Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Wikipedia to make ad hominem attacks. I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective. Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me. Thank you.

Morton Devonshire^Yo 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are very sensitive to criticism, Mo-ty, but I don't 'attack' you. I am sensitive to your attacks on wikipedia content. If you believe the comment by the president of Pakistan on the case is 'undue weight' why do you leave the next comment which states, "The U.S. Government believes that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed conspired in the kidnapping." Is this not equally unweighted? Or do you think everything your government says is gospel? I will remove this statement also for the time being. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Say it with me: "Morty". I know you can do it.

Morton Devonshire^Yo 21:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about Devon Mortonshire? Feel like answering the question yet? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 21:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baloney, this looks like borderline trolling. Just thought you ought to know. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 21:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Thanks for your support. Mo-ty needs to learn to put his fanatical nationalism to one side when he edits. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 21:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here, I am not "supporting" you - especially since you cannot have a discussion without attempting to push someone’s buttons. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 21:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but pushing Mo-ty's buttons is so easy and fun. You should try. Its addictive. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 21:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So this means you admit that you are trolling? JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 22:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm calling Mo-ty on his biased edits. When I do that he ignores my point and choses to be distracted by my misspelling his name (which is childish - few people ever spell my name correctly yet I take the time to answer their questions anyway) So, Morty, any hope of you explaining why a comment by the US government on an event in Pakistan is acceptable while a comment by the Pakistani government is 'undue weight'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 22:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, knock off the insults. You are not accomplishing anything. Second, with your confrontational attitude, I wouldn’t deal with you at all. You got off to a bad start on this one. I wouldn’t keep this harassment up if I were you. Cheers. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 22:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't think it would make any difference. After months and years of dealing with people like morty, TDS, Mongo, and the rest, it is clear that they have no interest in wikipedia. They are here to push their personal nationalistic bias. History, citation, reality, take a back seat to promotion of their personal myths. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 23:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay, if you feel that way, I'll let you have a chance to prove it.--MONGO 07:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

I have opened a request for comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan. Tom Harrison ^Talk 20:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMG

How did you do that thing with the title of your talk page, I must learn. Miltopia 22:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of the formatting is borrowed from User:ST47. One trick learned from him is that he also uses a header which is a separate page that he has built, and then inserts using the page name inside little two sets of opening and closing paranthesis. See his page and the one marked Head to see what I mean.

Morton Devonshire^Yo 02:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olbermann/Rumsfeld edit war

Hi, I started a topic in the Keith Olbermann discussion about the recent edit war. I invite you to contribute. Thanks, CalebNoble 09:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Nother conspiracy

What needs deleting. See here.[3] This one may take some off-wiki work, but I'm sure you'll manage to get her scrubbed anyway. Cheers. 23:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.2.85 (talk • contribs)

Now, now. Must play nice here.

Morton Devonshire^Yo 23:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't trouble yourself Mort. I've already faxed Rove, and the helicopters are spinning up as I post this. - Crockspot 00:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Black helicopters??? JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 19:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not just any black helicopters. We have our own VRWC-Logo fleet! - Crockspot 19:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome pic. Blackhawks?

Morton Devonshire^Yo 21:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another two cruft articles: Pierre Amine Gemayel and Rafik Hariri. There are editors suggesting it was some kind of conspiracy! Silly people - we all know conspiracies never happen. These were clearly cases of suicide and/or lone gunmen. Get de-crufting! ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 21:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than welcome to start your own conspiracy notice board. I would keep it in your own space though. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 21:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Na, I trust Morty to route out all this conspiracy stuff. I know he doesn't just do it for America-related conspiracy theories. That would be biased. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 21:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One user's view

Hey guy. I saw where "stone" censored your questioning his accusations. I was thinking of confronting him about it myself, but he doesn’t look to friendly. I’ll just let his comments at the RfC suffice to let everyone see his "good faith". I didn’t know I was part of a cabal. I didn’t know someone could make accusations like that and get away with it. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 20:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is where I am “honored” as part of the cabal. In his own words: I have been frequenting one of the boards on which this cabal of page vandals -- devonshire, junglecat, tdc, nuclearzero and their sockpuppets… Pretty strong statement. I am surprised no one has called him on it. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 20:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 ::::Here's another two cruft articles: [[Pierre Amine Gemayel]] and [[Rafik Hariri]]. There are editors suggesting it was some kind of conspiracy! Silly people - we all know conspiracies never happen. These were clearly cases of suicide and/or lone gunmen. Get de-crufting! ... al [[User:Seabhcan|Seabhcán]] bin [[User talk:Seabhcan|Baloney]] ''<small>([[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan|Hows my driving?]])</small>'' 21:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 :::You are more than welcome to start your own conspiracy notice board. I would keep it in your own space though. [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]]  <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">Shiny!</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">Oohhh!</font>]]</small> 21:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
+::::Na, I trust Morty to route out all this conspiracy stuff. I know he doesn't just do it for America-related conspiracy theories. That would be biased. ... al [[User:Seabhcan|Seabhcán]] bin [[User talk:Seabhcan|Baloney]] ''<small>([[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan|Hows my driving?]])</small>'' 21:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 ==One user's view==