User talk:Morton devonshire: Difference between revisions
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
::::Na, I trust Morty to route out all this conspiracy stuff. I know he doesn't just do it for America-related conspiracy theories. That would be biased. ... al [[User:Seabhcan|Seabhcán]] bin [[User talk:Seabhcan|Baloney]] ''<small>([[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan|Hows my driving?]])</small>'' 21:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
::::Na, I trust Morty to route out all this conspiracy stuff. I know he doesn't just do it for America-related conspiracy theories. That would be biased. ... al [[User:Seabhcan|Seabhcán]] bin [[User talk:Seabhcan|Baloney]] ''<small>([[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan|Hows my driving?]])</small>'' 21:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::::I know we all joke about conspiracy theories, and most of them are of little consequence because they are so outlandish. Those are the ones I'm most interested in eliminating here because they are not described widely by reputable sources. With respect to the two honorable gentlemen, Prime Minister Hariri and Mr. Gemayel, I will ask kindly that you not joke about their deaths. My friends in Beirut are heartbroken, and tell me that there are at least a dozen more assasinations carried out by Syrian agents that we haven't yet heard about in the Western press. No, not a laughing matter at all. [[Image:Matt_Devonshire2.jpg|20px]]<font size=2><font color="Blue">[[User:Morton_devonshire|'''Morton Devonshire''']]</font></font>[[User talk:Morton_devonshire|<i><sup><font color="Red">Yo</font></sup></i>]] 00:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC) |
:::::I know we all joke about conspiracy theories, and most of them are of little consequence because they are so outlandish. Those are the ones I'm most interested in eliminating here because they are not described widely by reputable sources. With respect to the two honorable gentlemen, Prime Minister Hariri and Mr. Gemayel, I will ask kindly that you not joke about their deaths. My friends in Beirut are heartbroken, and tell me that there are at least a dozen more assasinations carried out by Syrian agents that we haven't yet heard about in the Western press. No, not a laughing matter at all. [[Image:Matt_Devonshire2.jpg|20px]]<font size=2><font color="Blue">[[User:Morton_devonshire|'''Morton Devonshire''']]</font></font>[[User talk:Morton_devonshire|<i><sup><font color="Red">Yo</font></sup></i>]] 00:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
::::::I can assure you that Hariri and Gemayel are not the butt of my joke. But I note with interest that you seem to believe the conspiracy theories regarding Syria's involvement. Have you seen any evidence of it? ... al [[User:Seabhcan|Seabhcán]] bin [[User talk:Seabhcan|Baloney]] ''<small>([[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan|Hows my driving?]])</small>'' 00:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==One user's view== |
==One user's view== |
Revision as of 00:37, 22 November 2006
+ | This user likes getting friendly notices. |
Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Morton_devonshire. |
Contents
Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes ClosedSee this book review[1], where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work. Take a look at Roland RanceI tagged Roland Rance with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. Crockspot 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Another list of pagesTom Harrison Talk 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Daniel Pearl[2] Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
RfCI have opened a request for comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Seabhcan. Tom Harrison Talk 20:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC) ArchiveIt is in archive 4, which was empty. Travb (talk) 21:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC) OMGHow did you do that thing with the title of your talk page, I must learn. Miltopia 22:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Olbermann/Rumsfeld edit warHi, I started a topic in the Keith Olbermann discussion about the recent edit war. I invite you to contribute. Thanks, CalebNoble 09:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 'Nother conspiracyWhat needs deleting. See here.[3] This one may take some off-wiki work, but I'm sure you'll manage to get her scrubbed anyway. Cheers. 23:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.2.85 (talk • contribs)
One user's viewHey guy. I saw where "stone" censored your questioning his accusations. I was thinking of confronting him about it myself, but he doesn’t look to friendly. I’ll just let his comments at the RfC suffice to let everyone see his "good faith". I didn’t know I was part of a cabal. I didn’t know someone could make accusations like that and get away with it. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 20:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
|